- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: same disk model butt different ....
Operating System - Linux
1820256
Members
2599
Online
109622
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-25-2005 05:40 AM
тАО01-25-2005 05:40 AM
same disk model butt different ....
All,
I have two ide disks of the same model on two server with the same hardware. How come the udma option is different between the two. Below is an informational output from hdparm:
on system1:
/dev/hda:
Model=ST340016A, FwRev=3.75, SerialNo=3HS6E510
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=78165360
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: device does not report version: 1 2 3 4 5
on System2:
/dev/hda:
Model=ST340016A, FwRev=3.75, SerialNo=3HS6FHB0
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=78165360
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: device does not report version: 1 2 3 4 5
any idea why system1 is capable of udma5 and system2 is not? The reason I am asking about this is because system1 seems to have better I/O throughput compare to system2.
I have two ide disks of the same model on two server with the same hardware. How come the udma option is different between the two. Below is an informational output from hdparm:
on system1:
/dev/hda:
Model=ST340016A, FwRev=3.75, SerialNo=3HS6E510
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=78165360
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: device does not report version: 1 2 3 4 5
on System2:
/dev/hda:
Model=ST340016A, FwRev=3.75, SerialNo=3HS6FHB0
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=78165360
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: device does not report version: 1 2 3 4 5
any idea why system1 is capable of udma5 and system2 is not? The reason I am asking about this is because system1 seems to have better I/O throughput compare to system2.
Reputation of a thousand years can be determined by the conduct of an hour
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-25-2005 08:24 AM
тАО01-25-2005 08:24 AM
Re: same disk model butt different ....
I have to say that is really strange. The firmware is the same, the drives should be the same.
Two ideas come to mind:
1) The manufacturer added a feature that is not controlled by firmware.
2) The drive was modified by bios/OS to do UDMA5.
Suggestion: Bring this question to the drive manufacturer. They should explain it.
Suggestion2: Monitor i/o performance with the sar tools and see if your perception of an i/o advantage is in fact a reality.
SEP
Two ideas come to mind:
1) The manufacturer added a feature that is not controlled by firmware.
2) The drive was modified by bios/OS to do UDMA5.
Suggestion: Bring this question to the drive manufacturer. They should explain it.
Suggestion2: Monitor i/o performance with the sar tools and see if your perception of an i/o advantage is in fact a reality.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-25-2005 10:11 AM
тАО01-25-2005 10:11 AM
Re: same disk model butt different ....
Everything is the same, ie. kernel, jumpers, motherboard, cables, bios settings, hdparm versions?
My gut is telling me something is different, first thing that pops into my head is cabling/jumper configuration.
If they are indeed identical then I would call Seagate, like SEP suggested.
--Dave
My gut is telling me something is different, first thing that pops into my head is cabling/jumper configuration.
If they are indeed identical then I would call Seagate, like SEP suggested.
--Dave
Clothes make the man, Naked people have little to no effect on society
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-26-2005 06:07 AM
тАО01-26-2005 06:07 AM
Re: same disk model butt different ....
You may put hardrive from the first box to the second one - probably it'll help to understand what is different.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP