- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- HPE Nimble Storage
- >
- Array Performance and Data Protection
- >
- Veeam and Caching
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-23-2014 04:16 PM
12-23-2014 04:16 PM
Hi All
A client of ours has a system in place and they are currently sitting at about 75% cache usage.
We use Veeam to replicate (daily) to a datacentre for backups and DR so don't use the snapshot feature.
They have a number of servers that are static in nature and with them being backend servers, they are only read from occasionally by internal services.
My question is, is it worth moving these to a non cached volume so the caching can be used more for the always accessed data as I assume the reading of these servers daily is putting data into cache. Could we use the cache in a better way for the more prominent production servers? Or does the figure of 75% represent that this isn't an issue and data being read is cached.
Regards
Dave
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-24-2014 06:12 AM
12-24-2014 06:12 AM
SolutionGreat question
Since you're working with VM's I'd move the virtual disks in question to their own Volume (using the same performance policy) and utilize InfoSight after a 30 days or so to see how much Cache churn is occurring on the Volume. In my experience Nimble has been great at putting important data in cache and prioritizing that when you start to near the limit of your cache capacity. With the Cache Hit Rate in the Performance monitor and Cache Churn in InfoSight you can usually get an idea of what to plan for when dealing with worries like this.
They've also done a great job at picking up on the sequential nature of backup jobs and keeping those reads from polluting the cache.