HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- VC-FC - loadbalancing/failover mechanism issue
BladeSystem - General
1832606
Members
2291
Online
110043
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-15-2009 07:04 AM
01-15-2009 07:04 AM
VC-FC - loadbalancing/failover mechanism issue
Hi, We have a small issue concerning the VC fibre connects towards the SAN fabric. We did some disturbance testing and all went well except in once specific case. The setup was 2 VC-FC's in a C7000 enclosure (bay 3 & 4). Each VC-FC has 2 ports connected to a brocade. So we have one brocade per VC-FC. We have (because of the test only 2 blades running, one in slot1 and one in slot3). We created on the VC-FC's 2 fabrics (one for each VC-FC). Failover works in almost every case: unplugging cables, disabling ports,... all works except one case. If we disable a fabric by disabeling 2 ports on the brocade (lets say the 2 ports on Bay 4) and then Un-zone the active port (lets say port 2 in bay 3) on the working brocade, the VC doesn't failover to port 1. If we however do the same exercise with all ports enabled, and unzone the active port (active port being the port that shows activity on the brocade), the VC-FC automatically switches to another port. So we can't understand why with all ports working it does this failover thing, while if some are disabled and we unzone the second last port, it doesn't switch to the active port . Also the switching between ports in case of a disconnect takes +/-30 Seconds. Is this a setting somewhere? Did anyone else notice this? Any tips? Thanks in advance for reading this :) kind regards, Steve [Updated on 1/15/2009 7:35 AM] [Updated on 1/15/2009 7:36 AM]
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP