- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Vitual Connect vs. NO Virtual Connect
BladeSystem - General
1821071
Members
2522
Online
109631
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-21-2011 09:32 AM
тАО04-21-2011 09:32 AM
Vitual Connect vs. NO Virtual Connect
Hi,
I've been reading pros and cons about Virtual Connect and I thought that would be good to have them all in one thread.
So could you please share your thoughts on this?
Thank everybody in anticipation.
I've been reading pros and cons about Virtual Connect and I thought that would be good to have them all in one thread.
So could you please share your thoughts on this?
Thank everybody in anticipation.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-21-2011 07:13 PM
тАО04-21-2011 07:13 PM
Re: Vitual Connect vs. NO Virtual Connect
Virtual Connect vs Cisco and Brocade modules
The major reason for using Cisco or Brocade interconnect modules is to adhear with your network and san people. In that case your network only wants to use Cisco gear and/or your SAN group only will accept Brocade gear for SAN switching.
if your network and san group will not allow you to configure any switch for the enclosure then your only choice will be pass through modules but by using pass through modules you must then have anetwork and san cable for each nic snd FC port.
Virtual connect provides a very detailed network and fibrechannel switching features to reduce your cables but in addition the major eason for using Virtual connect also is that it allows you to assign MAC addresses to lan cards, serial numbers to blades and WWIDs to Fibrechannel ports in a profile that you assign to a device bay.
Lets say you have to replace a blade. The MAC addresses and serial number will change. This means that you need to coordinate with your LAN team to reconfigure the vlans to accept the new blade and possibly have to get a new software license key if a software product is keyed for the blade serial number.
WIth virtual connect you replace the blade, coordinate the boot issues and when the blade boots it inerits the mac addresses and serial number of the "PROFILE".
With the Fibrechanel virtual connect module you assign SAN WWIDs to Fibrechannel ports in the profile and if you have to replace a fibrechannel card in blade the new fibrechannel card is assigned the WWIDs by the profile and no SAN zoning or target mappng need to be redone.
Bottom line: virtual connect makes replacing Blades and fibrechannel cards easy. Heck if you boot from san if a blade fails you can just move the profile to a spare blade, let it boot and you are up and running with no need to replace hardware.
at the www.hp.com/go/blades there are many whitepapers on Virtual connect including myths and Virtual Connect for "Dummies" and Virtual Connect for Cisco.
You can also look on youtube.com for some virtual connect tech talks that I found were uploaded.
The major reason for using Cisco or Brocade interconnect modules is to adhear with your network and san people. In that case your network only wants to use Cisco gear and/or your SAN group only will accept Brocade gear for SAN switching.
if your network and san group will not allow you to configure any switch for the enclosure then your only choice will be pass through modules but by using pass through modules you must then have anetwork and san cable for each nic snd FC port.
Virtual connect provides a very detailed network and fibrechannel switching features to reduce your cables but in addition the major eason for using Virtual connect also is that it allows you to assign MAC addresses to lan cards, serial numbers to blades and WWIDs to Fibrechannel ports in a profile that you assign to a device bay.
Lets say you have to replace a blade. The MAC addresses and serial number will change. This means that you need to coordinate with your LAN team to reconfigure the vlans to accept the new blade and possibly have to get a new software license key if a software product is keyed for the blade serial number.
WIth virtual connect you replace the blade, coordinate the boot issues and when the blade boots it inerits the mac addresses and serial number of the "PROFILE".
With the Fibrechanel virtual connect module you assign SAN WWIDs to Fibrechannel ports in the profile and if you have to replace a fibrechannel card in blade the new fibrechannel card is assigned the WWIDs by the profile and no SAN zoning or target mappng need to be redone.
Bottom line: virtual connect makes replacing Blades and fibrechannel cards easy. Heck if you boot from san if a blade fails you can just move the profile to a spare blade, let it boot and you are up and running with no need to replace hardware.
at the www.hp.com/go/blades there are many whitepapers on Virtual connect including myths and Virtual Connect for "Dummies" and Virtual Connect for Cisco.
You can also look on youtube.com for some virtual connect tech talks that I found were uploaded.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-21-2011 07:22 PM
тАО04-21-2011 07:22 PM
Re: Vitual Connect vs. NO Virtual Connect
In addition if you have flex10 Nics in your blades or mezazine cards the passthrough and Cisco switch modules will only recognize 1 of the NICs and will not allow you to configure the FlexNics
So you need the flex10 Virtual connect module or the FlexFabric Virtual Connect module to take advantage of Flex10 Nics on Blades or Mezazine cards.
FlexFabric in case you weree interested is a new Lan/SAN connector on a few new blades but is backward compatible with FC ports and Ethernet ports on blades.
So you need the flex10 Virtual connect module or the FlexFabric Virtual Connect module to take advantage of Flex10 Nics on Blades or Mezazine cards.
FlexFabric in case you weree interested is a new Lan/SAN connector on a few new blades but is backward compatible with FC ports and Ethernet ports on blades.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP