GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Communications and Wireless
- >
- Re: Internal DSN Resolution Issue?
Communications and Wireless
1849240
Members
4477
Online
104042
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-13-2003 08:53 PM
01-13-2003 08:53 PM
Internal DSN Resolution Issue?
I am having a weird problem with my internal network's name resolution. I
have a name server set up to specifically deal with resolving all of our
internal clients, printers, servers, etc... (I am using RedHat 7.2 and Win
98 for the majority of these machines by the way)
Let just say that on a given machine if there isn't an entry in the host
file that corresponds to machineX and I ping machineX, I get this as output
back from ping.
# ping machineX
PING machineX.mydomain.com (192.168.2.246) from 192.168.2.90 : 56(84) bytes
of data.
Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures.
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=429 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=9.034 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=18.060 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=27.083 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=36.108 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=45.132 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=54.157 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=7 ttl=128 time=63.181 sec
(notice the pattern?)
Now when I have an entry that corresponds to machineX in my host file I
receive this output:
# ping machineX
PING machineX (192.168.2.246) from 192.168.2.90 : 56(84) bytes of data.
Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures.
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=474 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=247 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=250 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=237 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=245 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=245 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=253 usec
(notice the beautiful pings?)
My resolv.conf file looks like this:
search mydomain.com
nameserver 192.168.2.254
The weird thing is, is that the first line of output from the ping statement
(when the given machine is w/o the machineX host file entry):
PING machineX.mydomain.com (192.168.2.246) from 192.168.2.90 : 56(84) bytes
of data.
comes back very fast...
Also, when I do something like try to ssh FROM machineX TO this given
machine (and I don't have an entry for machineX in this machines host file),
it takes forever with respect the time it takes when this given machine has
an entry for machineX in it's host file.
I am not certain what to make of this and would love your help in resolving
this problem...
Thanks is advance!
have a name server set up to specifically deal with resolving all of our
internal clients, printers, servers, etc... (I am using RedHat 7.2 and Win
98 for the majority of these machines by the way)
Let just say that on a given machine if there isn't an entry in the host
file that corresponds to machineX and I ping machineX, I get this as output
back from ping.
# ping machineX
PING machineX.mydomain.com (192.168.2.246) from 192.168.2.90 : 56(84) bytes
of data.
Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures.
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=429 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=9.034 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=18.060 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=27.083 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=36.108 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=45.132 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=54.157 sec
64 bytes from 192.168.2.246: icmp_seq=7 ttl=128 time=63.181 sec
(notice the pattern?)
Now when I have an entry that corresponds to machineX in my host file I
receive this output:
# ping machineX
PING machineX (192.168.2.246) from 192.168.2.90 : 56(84) bytes of data.
Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures.
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=474 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=247 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=250 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=237 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=245 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=245 usec
64 bytes from machineX (192.168.2.246): icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=253 usec
(notice the beautiful pings?)
My resolv.conf file looks like this:
search mydomain.com
nameserver 192.168.2.254
The weird thing is, is that the first line of output from the ping statement
(when the given machine is w/o the machineX host file entry):
PING machineX.mydomain.com (192.168.2.246) from 192.168.2.90 : 56(84) bytes
of data.
comes back very fast...
Also, when I do something like try to ssh FROM machineX TO this given
machine (and I don't have an entry for machineX in this machines host file),
it takes forever with respect the time it takes when this given machine has
an entry for machineX in it's host file.
I am not certain what to make of this and would love your help in resolving
this problem...
Thanks is advance!
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-13-2003 08:55 PM
01-13-2003 08:55 PM
Re: Internal DSN Resolution Issue?
dar... DNS
jeez... where is the edit button? =D
jeez... where is the edit button? =D
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-14-2003 07:58 AM
01-14-2003 07:58 AM
Re: Internal DSN Resolution Issue?
First, I would upgrade to the 2.4.9-13 kernel.
see:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37485
That would get rid of your time of day error message.
Your other problem is caused by a bug in ping which is Bug 68212. That interacts with a DNS bug 57998
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57998
Ron
see:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37485
That would get rid of your time of day error message.
Your other problem is caused by a bug in ping which is Bug 68212. That interacts with a DNS bug 57998
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57998
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-16-2003 08:01 AM
01-16-2003 08:01 AM
Re: Internal DSN Resolution Issue?
ok... this problem was indeed caused by a problem with reverse zone info...
The person who configured the named.conf file before me had this in the file:
zone "0.2.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "192.168.2.0.rev";
notify no;
};
This is incorrect! It should read like such:
zone "2.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "192.168.2.0.rev";
notify no;
};
notice the 0 left off of the zone statement?
The person who configured the named.conf file before me had this in the file:
zone "0.2.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "192.168.2.0.rev";
notify no;
};
This is incorrect! It should read like such:
zone "2.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "192.168.2.0.rev";
notify no;
};
notice the 0 left off of the zone statement?
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP