- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Comware Based
- >
- bridge-aggregation interface remains UP even if al...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-27-2018 01:17 AM - edited тАО03-27-2018 01:21 AM
тАО03-27-2018 01:17 AM - edited тАО03-27-2018 01:21 AM
bridge-aggregation interface remains UP even if all lacp members on other site are down
Hi,
Due to an acquisition we inherited a network based on HPE/procurve switches, the central core being an A5500-48G-4SFP stack
on that switch we have 2 long distance links towards our network. This is an mpls service, no dark-fiber, so link down on 1 side is not propagated to other side.
For that reason we enabled LACP (via bridge-aggregation) do have faster failover timers in case of an intermediate problem with our provider which doesn't cause link down situations. This is a technique we also use with cisco and juniper, so that if the aeX / PoX interface goes down, the switch knows there is a problem
Now it seems that our Bridge-Aggregation interface remains up, even if we shut the link on our side of the network
state of the bridge aggregation while our side is down (in our setup it is port GE1/0/48 that is the long distance link, the other links are physical down) .What bothers me (as an juniper/cisco guy) is the flags E & F
display link-aggregation verbose Bridge-Aggregation 46
Loadsharing Type: Shar -- Loadsharing, NonS -- Non-Loadsharing
Port Status: S -- Selected, U -- Unselected
Flags: A -- LACP_Activity, B -- LACP_Timeout, C -- Aggregation,
D -- Synchronization, E -- Collecting, F -- Distributing,
G -- Defaulted, H -- Expired
Aggregation Interface: Bridge-Aggregation46
Aggregation Mode: Dynamic
Loadsharing Type: Shar
System ID: 0x8000, d07e-2869-0a7f
Local:
Port Status Priority Oper-Key Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GE1/0/47 U 32768 16 {ABCG}
GE1/0/48 S 32768 16 {ABCDEFG}
GE2/0/47 U 32768 16 {ABCG}
Remote:
Actor Partner Priority Oper-Key SystemID Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GE1/0/47 0 32768 0 0x8000, 0000-0000-0000 {EF}
GE1/0/48 0 32768 0 0x8000, 0000-0000-0000 {DEF}
GE2/0/47 0 32768 0 0x8000, 0000-0000-0000 {EF}
interface Bridge-Aggregation46
description " ****** "
port link-type trunk
undo port trunk permit vlan 1
port trunk permit vlan 123 444 555 666 777
link-aggregation mode dynamic
link-aggregation selected-port minimum 1
stp edged-port enable
arp rate-limit disable
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/48
port link-mode bridge
port link-type trunk
undo port trunk permit vlan 1
port trunk permit vlan 123 444 555 666 777
sflow sampling-rate 1000
sflow flow collector 1
lacp period short
port link-aggregation group 46
arp rate-limit disable
any suggestions? The problem here is that if we have a problem on 1 of the links, our VPLS service failover doesn't work because the HPE keeps sending all the mac addresses toward the old (broken) link until they age out. We were hoping by getting the bridge-aggregation interface to go down, the mac would be flushed and flooded to the other link (so learning can happen there)
version is
Comware Software, Version 5.20.99, Release 5206P01
thx
Arne
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-27-2018 01:26 PM
тАО03-27-2018 01:26 PM
Re: bridge-aggregation interface remains UP even if all lacp members on other site are down
It looks like there is something wrong on your three interfaces' LAG on your IRF stacked Switches (note how GE1/0/47 an GE2/0/47 aren't in Selected state, see the U).
display link-aggregation verbose Bridge-Aggregation 46 Loadsharing Type: Shar -- Loadsharing, NonS -- Non-Loadsharing Port Status: S -- Selected, U -- Unselected Flags: A -- LACP_Activity, B -- LACP_Timeout, C -- Aggregation, D -- Synchronization, E -- Collecting, F -- Distributing, G -- Defaulted, H -- Expired Aggregation Interface: Bridge-Aggregation46 Aggregation Mode: Dynamic Loadsharing Type: Shar System ID: 0x8000, d07e-2869-0a7f Local: Port Status Priority Oper-Key Flag -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GE1/0/47 U 32768 16 {ABCG} GE1/0/48 S 32768 16 {ABCDEFG} GE2/0/47 U 32768 16 {ABCG} Remote: Actor Partner Priority Oper-Key SystemID Flag -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GE1/0/47 0 32768 0 0x8000, 0000-0000-0000 {EF} GE1/0/48 0 32768 0 0x8000, 0000-0000-0000 {DEF} GE2/0/47 0 32768 0 0x8000, 0000-0000-0000 {EF}
AFAIK LACP (IEEE 802.3ad) requires direct connectivity (copper or fiber, no matters) between involved peers' ports
Switch A LAG <=== uninterrupted/direct links ===> LAG Switch B
No intermediate devices not partecipating to end peers' LAGs are admitted.
I'm not an HPE Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-29-2018 03:25 AM
тАО03-29-2018 03:25 AM
Re: bridge-aggregation interface remains UP even if all lacp members on other site are down
Hi
the 2 U ports are links that are disconnected (for testing purposes). So I'm not worried about that
about the direct connection... as long as you have a service that forwards your LACP packets, there can be as many devices in between as you want. The problem is also not that the link doesn't come up. The problem is that the link doesn't go down :)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-29-2018 12:04 PM - edited тАО03-29-2018 02:04 PM
тАО03-29-2018 12:04 PM - edited тАО03-29-2018 02:04 PM
Re: bridge-aggregation interface remains UP even if all lacp members on other site are down
@arnevtwrote: The problem is also not that the link doesn't come up. The problem is that the link doesn't go down :)
Exactly because there are intermediate devices to which links are not down even if one side of the aggregated links is down.
@arnevtwrote:a bout the direct connection... as long as you have a service that forwards your LACP packets, there can be as many devices in between as you want.
AFAIK the point-to-point is (and always was) an essential prerequisite.
I'm not an HPE Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-03-2018 07:02 PM
тАО04-03-2018 07:02 PM
Re: bridge-aggregation interface remains UP even if all lacp members on other site are down
Yeah, I found that very confusing - you've got a point-to-point Layer2 protocol and you think it can work over a routed network.
That's a very confusing concept for me.
802.3 (of which 802.3ad is one) are ethernet standards.
I don't even understand the problem that is trying to be solved here - you should be getting routes from your MPLS provider for each site that is currently up on their network. If one of those sites goes down, you should have either a default route pointing at a different link, or maybe the different link is advertising a higher-cost route.
Link aggregation has nothing to do with directing traffic onto alternate links, because all the members of each bundle have the same two end-points.