- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Comware Based
- >
- HP 1920 Ring Topology with 3 switches
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-29-2020 07:21 AM
тАО12-29-2020 07:21 AM
Hello,
I have been presented with a configuration that I believe is incorrect, and am seeking guidance to confirm or reject my suspicion.
I've always been of the opinion that switch port uplinks to other switches, router, and firewalls should be Trunk (I come from a Cisco background). Additionally, I've lived under the asumption that in the HP world of hybrid ports that Hybrid really are just for endpoint devices where you need (for example) a phone and a PC to share the same port; is this a correct or incorrect assumption?
Additionally, aside from potentially changing the uplink connections from Hybrid to Trunk, are there any other considerations for maintaining the ring topology or guidance to move away from the Ring topology?
There are 3 HPE OfficeConnect 1920 switches (all JG928A) physically connected in a Ring Topology. Pertinent information is as follows:
Switch names:
HP-1920-MDF1
HP-1920-MDF2
HP-1920-IDF
Physically, the switches are connected as follows:
MDF1 Gig 1/0/1 is connected to MDF2 1/0/1
MDF1 Gig 1/0/2 is connected to IDF Gig 1/0/1
MDF1 Gig 1/0/4 is connected to IDF 1/0/2
IDF Gig 1/0/4 is connected to MDF2 Gig 1/0/3
Switchport configuration is as follows:
MDF1:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
port link-type hybrid
port hybrid vlan 100 999 tagged
port hybrid vlan 1 untagged
port auto-power-down
poe enable
stp edged-port enable
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
port link-type hybrid
port hybrid vlan 100 999 tagged
port hybrid vlan 1 untagged
port auto-power-down
poe enable
stp edged-port enable
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4
port link-type hybrid
port hybrid vlan 100 tagged
port hybrid vlan 1 untagged
port auto-power-down
poe enable
stp edged-port enable
MDF2:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
port link-type hybrid
port hybrid vlan 100 999 tagged
port hybrid vlan 1 untagged
port auto-power-down
poe enable
stp edged-port enable
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/3
port link-type hybrid
port hybrid vlan 100 999 tagged
port hybrid vlan 1 untagged
port auto-power-down
poe enable
stp edged-port enable
IDF:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
port link-type hybrid
port hybrid vlan 100 999 tagged
port hybrid vlan 1 untagged
port auto-power-down
poe enable
stp edged-port enable
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
port link-type hybrid
port hybrid vlan 100 999 tagged
port hybrid vlan 1 untagged
port auto-power-down
poe enable
stp edged-port enable
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4
port link-type hybrid
port hybrid vlan 100 999 tagged
port hybrid vlan 1 untagged
port auto-power-down
poe enable
stp edged-port enable
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-30-2020 03:22 AM
тАО12-30-2020 03:22 AM
SolutionHello, I would suggest you another approach: get rid of the link between MDF1 and MDF2 switches and enhance downlink resiliency between IDF and, respectively, each MDF switch by using a Links Aggregation (a LAG between IDF and MDF1 and another LAG between IDF and MDF2).
Get rid of Port Link of type Hybrid.
You have to consider that an interface - physical or logical (as a LAG), doesn't matter - carrying (if necessary) more than one VLAN (more than its PVID) should be set of type Trunk..and in HPE OfficeConnect 1920 Comware 5 jargon/terminology "Trunk" means exactly what it means in Cisco world (a LAG instead is an EtherChannel).
So to summarize and assuming you're starting from a port default state:
- On IDF Switch create two LAGs - say LAG 1 and LAG 2 - with two (or more) physical interfaces each one.
- Set the IDF LAG 1 to carry required VLAN IDs to MDF 1 Switch's LAG 1 (generally there is a PVID = Untagged and one or more VLAN ID as tagged).
- Do the same (to match) on the MDF 1 Switch (MDF 1 Switch will have LAG 1).
- Set the IDF LAG 2 to carry required VLAN IDs to MDF 2 Switch's LAG 1 (generally there is a PVID = Untagged and one or more VLAN ID as tagged)
- Do the same (to match) on the MDF 2 Switch (MDF 2 Switch will have LAG 1).
- Connect IDF cables between LAG 1 (IDF) and LAG 1 (MDF 1), connect cables between LAG 2 (IDF) and LAG 1 (MDF 2)
- Ensure STP is enabled and properly configured on IDF, MDF 1 and MDF 2 switches (use RSTP).
If so (STP is OK) you can eventually interconnect again MDF 1 and MDF 2 with a single link as a sort of backup link in case MDF 1 or MDF 2 will be disconnected by IDF (this inter-switch link will be automatically blocked by STP, this is correct and expected).
I'm not an HPE Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-02-2021 01:57 PM
тАО01-02-2021 01:57 PM
Re: HP 1920 Ring Topology with 3 switches
Thanks Parnassus,
I don't have that many ports available on the IDF, but I get what you're driving at with the LAG idea. At this point I was considering just dropping one of the IDF connections an making everything a Trunk port between the switches. Thanks for the clarification.
In your experience, what purpose does the Hybrid port really serve? Just for VoiceData ports as I mentioned, or anything else?
Thanks,
Jonboy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-03-2021 08:14 AM
тАО01-03-2021 08:14 AM
Re: HP 1920 Ring Topology with 3 switches
Hello Jonboy,
Start here and have a read here too (in particular what Richard Lichtfield wrote): if you're not dealing with VoIP phones - so you aren't dealing with access ports (and you aren't on your uplink ports) - then the trunk operating mode is the way to go on HPE OfficeConnect 1920 Switch Series (which is Comware 5 OS based).
Also consider that newer HPE OfficeConnect 1920S Switch Series that superseded the older HPE OfficeConnect 1920 Switch Series (and the same can be said about all HP ProCurve ProVision OS based switch series some of them now rebranded as HPE Aruba ArubaOS-Switch OS based switch series) has no concept of "hybrid" port.
I'm not an HPE Employee
