- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-27-2007 01:39 AM
08-27-2007 01:39 AM
Background Parity Initializing/Queued
Background parity initialization is currently queued or in progress on logical drive 1 ( RAID 5 in array A). If background parity initialization is queued, it will start when I/O is performed on the drive. When background parity initialization completes, the performance of the logical drive will improve.
And i think that message has been there a couple of days how do we solve this?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2007 09:38 PM
08-28-2007 09:38 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
Please run the adu report and attach the report so that we can get more information regarding the issue.
Cheers
Akarsh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2007 11:27 PM
08-28-2007 11:27 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-11-2007 02:46 PM
09-11-2007 02:46 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
I just recieved the same error after a rebuild of the arrray on a ML 370 with and online spare. It is a Samrt array 642 Controller.
Any solutions???
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-11-2007 04:41 PM
09-11-2007 04:41 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
what is the server model? and OS?
so try applying the latest firmware CD for your server?
also I recommend you to have the more recent Array diagnostic utility (now you have 7.4)
the idea is to get a more accurate error report.
can you get into your OS?
regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-01-2007 08:32 PM
11-01-2007 08:32 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
I'm having the same problem on one of our old servers.
It is a ProLiant ML350 G3.
Server works. I'm able to log in and make changes. I believe I can notice it operating a little sluggish.
Any ideas?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2007 10:39 PM
11-13-2007 10:39 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-14-2007 02:02 AM
11-14-2007 02:02 AM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
Even more interesting, I have 2 RAID arrays on this same controller (C is RAID-1 and D is RAID5) and all the tools can see the C drive, but none can see the D drive.
I am not absolutely sure if these problems are related or not. Any one else seeing similar issues?
Thanks,
Mike
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-14-2007 08:23 AM
11-14-2007 08:23 AM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-26-2007 10:26 PM
11-26-2007 10:26 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
tnx
Srdjan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-27-2007 10:38 PM - last edited on 01-24-2025 12:42 AM by Sunitha_Mod
11-27-2007 10:38 PM - last edited on 01-24-2025 12:42 AM by Sunitha_Mod
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
Hi, this is a summary of what I have found searching several cases.
1st, check this advisory (available only though google cache):http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:a4dmEdpMAO0J:h200003.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp%3Flang%3Des%26cc%3Des%26taskId%3D110%26prodSeriesId%3D316599%26prodTypeId%3D15351%26objectID%3DPSD_EC030424_CW01+EC030424_CW01&hl=es&ct=clnk&cd=1
2nd: background parity initialization is started only after the logical unit has been idle for 15 seconds. In a cluster, it's written at least once every 3 seconds.
3rd: The background parity initialization is also not started if the logical unit has not been accessed at all.
[Moderator edit: Removed the broken link. Please refer to https://support.hpe.com/]
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-05-2007 04:48 AM
12-05-2007 04:48 AM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-02-2008 08:12 PM
01-02-2008 08:12 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
I also have the same case on my DL380G4 with it's native SA6i configured as 1 array & 2 logical drive (100Gb and 1.4TB). I think that SA do the task sequencely, mean logical 1 first then logical 2, rebuilding or parity initializing. My logical drive 2 status is now OK, it mean rebuild & parity initial has completed successfully, am I right ? But the logical drive 1 that only 100GB status is still in "Backgroud Parity Initializing". That message had been there since a week ago, when that will get out from there . What shoud I do next ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2008 11:27 AM
03-26-2008 11:27 AM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
one question have you guys had the change the rebuild priority in ACU to high.
cause you know that if its in "low" priority its not going to rebuild unless the server is not being use by anyone.
this is something just to point out.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2008 06:09 PM
03-26-2008 06:09 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
You're right, change rebuild priority setting to high made the rebuild process proceed more immediately. But in my case still need up to about 5x24 hours. Sorry I forgot to reply the forum when I done. BTW thank you for your reply.
Regard,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2008 03:18 AM
06-10-2008 03:18 AM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
I have my expand and parity set to high. Is there anything else I can do?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2008 05:46 PM
06-10-2008 05:46 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
set both expand and rebuild priority setting to HIGH, this will reduce the time to expand or rebuild the array, because it will process the expand or rebuild not only when the server idle. As I know, there is no availability to monitor parity check status. As I note from the forum that it need about 15 minutes/GB to process. After expanding is completed then the parity check begin.Maybe somebody else know how many time needed to check parity/GB.Thank you.
Yayat
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-18-2008 02:08 AM
06-18-2008 02:08 AM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
What is the technical difference between building an array and initializing parity?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-08-2010 08:17 PM
08-08-2010 08:17 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
If i expand the Rebuild and Expand Priority; will that cause the deletion of the data currently exist in hte logical drives.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-08-2010 11:11 PM
08-08-2010 11:11 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-03-2010 08:27 AM
12-03-2010 08:27 AM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
The cause for this is that the Parity initialization is hung or frozen and some array tools do not show this since the Parity Initialization percentage complete is not shown.
I had several servers all affected by this issue and was able to clear them all be doing the following
Have Array configuration utility version 8.28.13.0 installed. This is cp010232.exe
From inside the array configuration utility, if you choose the logical drive that has the 785 alert on it and choose â More Informationâ you will see that there will be a percentage showing as to the percent complete. It seems that this process for me anyway was hung at 0 percent for several servers and 17 for another.
Other versions of the array config utility for some reason do not show this percentage readout, only that the status is â in progressâ . These versions include 8.50.5.0 and 8.50.6.0.
What cleared this issue here was a reboot. After a reboot on the affected servers was done the parity initialization took right off and ran to completion. I was able to watch this occur by refreshing the % readout from inside the 8.28.13.0 version of the ACU.
Bottom line here is that the Parity Initialization may be stuck for some unknown reason and since the only version of the ACU (8.28.13.0) that I could find shows the percentage complete. If you donâ t have a version of the ACU that shows this percentage readout it could be hung and you donâ t know it. And all it takes to resolve it is a reboot.
Searchable Keywords
Morjo15 morjo15 Array Configuration Utility stuck hung 785 cp010232.exe 8.50.5.0 8.50.6.0 8.28.13.0 solution fix
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-22-2014 05:03 PM - edited 04-22-2014 05:04 PM
04-22-2014 05:03 PM - edited 04-22-2014 05:04 PM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
Just wait. This message is not earth shattering. The background parity can take a while to initialize. It is not critical to the operation of your server; however, when finished the slight performance ding you feel will go away, and your server will have a higher degree of reliability.
Also, I am guessing by now it has gone away...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2014 09:31 AM
05-27-2014 09:31 AM
Re: Background Parity Initializing/Queued
I faced the same issue this morning on a G7 Bl460c using a D6000 Disk Array. In my case the parity Initialization mismatch was due to the type of array I selected. I came back to Raid 5 using 4 x 3 TB to create mountpoint drives and now the Background Parity Initialization started to run in the background. After a full refresh and a server reboot the process completed successfully and now it is gone.