- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- SmartArray 5302 Performance
Disk Enclosures
1820708
Members
2764
Online
109627
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-23-2003 08:23 PM
07-23-2003 08:23 PM
SmartArray 5302 Performance
We have 2 different servers, an ML 370 and a ML 560 (I think). One has one 5302-64 and the other has 2 5302-128 controllers. The server with one controller has 12 internal disks, the other has 2 shelves of 14 disks per shelf with a channel connected to 7 disks (dual bus shelf). All the disks are 10k 72GB. The internals are Ultra3, and the others are Ultra320. We are running Linux.
It appears that we can get only about 70 MB/sec per channel on either box. We have tried RAID 0, RAID 0+1, and RAID 5. With just a one disk RAID 0 we can get 50 MB/sec reads. However, it appears that adding more disks to the RAID set tops out at 70 MB/sec no matter how many disks are used.
We can not tell if this is a controller bottleneck (70 MB/sec per channel) or a Ultra 160 SCSI bottleneck on the SCSI bus itself.
Has anyone gotten better performance from this card?
Also, I am wondering if the new 6402 controller that is Ultra 320 will really do any better. I think the disk shelf we are using (4354R) is an Ultra 160 device, so I am not sure the faster controller will actually produce any faster throughput.
It appears that we can get only about 70 MB/sec per channel on either box. We have tried RAID 0, RAID 0+1, and RAID 5. With just a one disk RAID 0 we can get 50 MB/sec reads. However, it appears that adding more disks to the RAID set tops out at 70 MB/sec no matter how many disks are used.
We can not tell if this is a controller bottleneck (70 MB/sec per channel) or a Ultra 160 SCSI bottleneck on the SCSI bus itself.
Has anyone gotten better performance from this card?
Also, I am wondering if the new 6402 controller that is Ultra 320 will really do any better. I think the disk shelf we are using (4354R) is an Ultra 160 device, so I am not sure the faster controller will actually produce any faster throughput.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-24-2003 05:02 AM
07-24-2003 05:02 AM
Re: SmartArray 5302 Performance
Bill
You did well to get 50MB/s from One disk!! I think that is the max listed speed.
Anyway.... I can't say for sure if the SCSI is maxed out BUT I think it is the SCSI card.
the problem is that there is obviuosly more than one place for the bottleneck to occour - it could also be the internal bus of the storage unit. To show where it is would require some testing (sorry) during the test look at the utilisations of the disks, also daisy chain the storage units together, from these 3 tests you will be able to deduce where the bottleneck really is...you might get something like the following
1 storage unit (1x SCSI bus)
1x dsk RAID1 - 50MB/s disk util 100%
2x dsk RAID1 - 70MB/s disk util 70%
4x dsk RAID1 - 70MB/s disk util 35%
etc
2 storage unit in parallel (2x SCSI bus) disks in alternating units
1x dsk RAID1 - 50MB/s disk util 100%
2x dsk RAID1 - 100MB/s disk util 100%
4x dsk RAID1 - 140MB/s disk util 70%
2 storage units in serial (1x SCSI bus) disks in alternating units
1x dsk RAID1 - 50MB/s disk util 100%
2x dsk RAID1 - 70MB/s disk util 70%
4x dsk RAID1 - 70MB/s disk util 35%
anyway, If you are up for it those are the tests you could do.
regards
Tim
You did well to get 50MB/s from One disk!! I think that is the max listed speed.
Anyway.... I can't say for sure if the SCSI is maxed out BUT I think it is the SCSI card.
the problem is that there is obviuosly more than one place for the bottleneck to occour - it could also be the internal bus of the storage unit. To show where it is would require some testing (sorry) during the test look at the utilisations of the disks, also daisy chain the storage units together, from these 3 tests you will be able to deduce where the bottleneck really is...you might get something like the following
1 storage unit (1x SCSI bus)
1x dsk RAID1 - 50MB/s disk util 100%
2x dsk RAID1 - 70MB/s disk util 70%
4x dsk RAID1 - 70MB/s disk util 35%
etc
2 storage unit in parallel (2x SCSI bus) disks in alternating units
1x dsk RAID1 - 50MB/s disk util 100%
2x dsk RAID1 - 100MB/s disk util 100%
4x dsk RAID1 - 140MB/s disk util 70%
2 storage units in serial (1x SCSI bus) disks in alternating units
1x dsk RAID1 - 50MB/s disk util 100%
2x dsk RAID1 - 70MB/s disk util 70%
4x dsk RAID1 - 70MB/s disk util 35%
anyway, If you are up for it those are the tests you could do.
regards
Tim
-
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP