HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- VA7410 performance when rebuilding
Disk Enclosures
1834605
Members
4722
Online
110069
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-05-2008 10:20 AM
01-05-2008 10:20 AM
VA7410 performance when rebuilding
Have a VA7410 that recently lost a (73GB 15K)drive during business hours. It is set for all the defaults except RAID level is RAID1+0. And there is unallocated space equal to a single drive on each RG, so effectively two hot spares per RG.
While the array was rebuilding (rebuild priority: Low), performance of the RG with the failed drive was abysmal - maybe 10% of normal. Once the rebuild finished, performance returned to normal.
I've been told before that these arrays disable write caching when a battery is bad, accounting for terrible performance, but why would there be a similar loss of performance while rebuilding? There's no need for caching to be disabled.
I'm guessing I either need to config back to AutoRaid or set the rebuild priority to High, which couldn't possibly make performance worse. Can anyone say for sure the best solution?
thanks,
Carl
While the array was rebuilding (rebuild priority: Low), performance of the RG with the failed drive was abysmal - maybe 10% of normal. Once the rebuild finished, performance returned to normal.
I've been told before that these arrays disable write caching when a battery is bad, accounting for terrible performance, but why would there be a similar loss of performance while rebuilding? There's no need for caching to be disabled.
I'm guessing I either need to config back to AutoRaid or set the rebuild priority to High, which couldn't possibly make performance worse. Can anyone say for sure the best solution?
thanks,
Carl
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP