HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Legacy
- >
- General
- >
- Re: is energy a real problem?
General
1830636
Members
2795
Online
110015
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-17-2005 02:19 PM
05-17-2005 02:19 PM
Dear all,
Recently there are lots of people talk about energy saving (especially for disks) in large data center and doing trade-off between system performance and energy saving.
I am wondering whether enrgy consumption is really a big problem in data center and other large storage systems, or people just need a topic to write papers.
If it is a problem, what are the common requirements? for example "maxize the energy saving but the performance degradation should be less than 5%"
Thanks a lot and have a good night
Dong
Recently there are lots of people talk about energy saving (especially for disks) in large data center and doing trade-off between system performance and energy saving.
I am wondering whether enrgy consumption is really a big problem in data center and other large storage systems, or people just need a topic to write papers.
If it is a problem, what are the common requirements? for example "maxize the energy saving but the performance degradation should be less than 5%"
Thanks a lot and have a good night
Dong
Solved! Go to Solution.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-17-2005 05:29 PM
05-17-2005 05:29 PM
Solution
The problem is that the electrical energy that is fed into the data center costs money and a lot of electrical energy is converted into heat which needs to be removed from the data center again. For that you need additional equipment which, again costs money, so its a good idea to try and save the electrical energy in the first place.
I have heard about attempts to make servers less energy hungry. For example, by turning off parts or a whole CPU when it is not needed, but I have never heard about any such attempts in the storage space. You can try to build a disk drive with less mass, so you can feed it with less energy to keep the moving parts rotating, for example, but I have never heard about strategies to degrade performance to save energy. Do you have some pointers?
We have discussed this in the past and I like to repeat that I don't think it is a good idea to spin down a high performance disk drive multiple times.
I have heard about attempts to make servers less energy hungry. For example, by turning off parts or a whole CPU when it is not needed, but I have never heard about any such attempts in the storage space. You can try to build a disk drive with less mass, so you can feed it with less energy to keep the moving parts rotating, for example, but I have never heard about strategies to degrade performance to save energy. Do you have some pointers?
We have discussed this in the past and I like to repeat that I don't think it is a good idea to spin down a high performance disk drive multiple times.
.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-18-2005 01:59 PM
05-18-2005 01:59 PM
Re: is energy a real problem?
Hi Uwe,
Thanks so much for your reply.
I do remember our discussion about saving disk energy by spinning down disks in July,2004 on this forum.
On single disk environments,like PC or laptop, a common disk energy saving policy is to spin down disk to standby state after a no-request period. The disk will be spun up when a request arriving.
If we can generate such a long idle period for some(maybe not all)server disks with affordable performance degradation, do you think it's an acceptable idea to save disk energy for storage systems?
Dong
Thanks so much for your reply.
I do remember our discussion about saving disk energy by spinning down disks in July,2004 on this forum.
On single disk environments,like PC or laptop, a common disk energy saving policy is to spin down disk to standby state after a no-request period. The disk will be spun up when a request arriving.
If we can generate such a long idle period for some(maybe not all)server disks with affordable performance degradation, do you think it's an acceptable idea to save disk energy for storage systems?
Dong
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP