HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- >
- Redundant FCA's using bandwidth of both FCA's simu...
HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
1825785
Members
2092
Online
109687
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-18-2001 01:03 PM
05-18-2001 01:03 PM
Redundant FCA's using bandwidth of both FCA's simultanously?
I'm trying to increase the Fiber Channel path from my 9000 N-class server to a 3rd party SAN (XioTech). My assumption is that if I install a second FCA and assign both HAB's to the same cluster on the SAN side then HP-UX (11.00) will automaticly utilize both paths, thereby doubling my trunk to the SAN as giving me a level of redundancy in the event that one FCA fails. Am I correct? Would this setup require any configuration on the server/OS side? Has anyone tried this and succeeded/failed?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-18-2001 01:05 PM
05-18-2001 01:05 PM
Re: Redundant FCA's using bandwidth of both FCA's simultanously?
BTW, I am using Tachyon card. (HP A5158A)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-20-2001 08:27 PM
05-20-2001 08:27 PM
Re: Redundant FCA's using bandwidth of both FCA's simultanously?
Jim,
Adding a second FCA to a system to increase performance & redundancy can be done easily, but is done at the PV level. The inbuilt alternate pathing within LVM can do this in a fashion - it's not load balancing, rather load splitting (ie: Not dynamic).
Say you can see same PV at c2t0d0 and c4t0d0, you can do a vgextend with both device names to use alternate pathing.
eg:
vgextend vg02 /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 /dev/dsk/c4t0d0
The important thing to note is that the FIRST path (c2t0d0) will used for all I/O operations unless that path is down. The way you can load balance over 2 FCA's is by alternating the device name pairs when doing the vgextend
eg:
vgextend vg02 /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 /dev/dsk/c4t0d0
vgextend vg02 /dev/dsk/c4t1d0 /dev/dsk/c2t1d0
vgextend vg02 /dev/dsk/c2t2d0 /dev/dsk/c4t2d0
If you have an existing vg, you can use vgexport and vgimport to achieve the same result.
say...
vgexport -m /tmp/mapfile vg02
mkdir vg02
mknod /dev/vg02/group c 64 0x020000
vgimport -m /tmp/mapfile vg02 c2t0d0 c4t0d0 c4t1d0 c2t1d0 c2t2d0 c4t2d0......
OR
say the disks under c4t?d? are the new paths
use vgextend to add all the c4t?d?'s
use vgreduce every second c2t?d? to make the c4 a primary
then vgextend the c2t?d?'s to add them back, now as the secondary path.
vgdisplay -v will show you which path is being used as the primary. (Always the first entry)
Hope this helps.
Adding a second FCA to a system to increase performance & redundancy can be done easily, but is done at the PV level. The inbuilt alternate pathing within LVM can do this in a fashion - it's not load balancing, rather load splitting (ie: Not dynamic).
Say you can see same PV at c2t0d0 and c4t0d0, you can do a vgextend with both device names to use alternate pathing.
eg:
vgextend vg02 /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 /dev/dsk/c4t0d0
The important thing to note is that the FIRST path (c2t0d0) will used for all I/O operations unless that path is down. The way you can load balance over 2 FCA's is by alternating the device name pairs when doing the vgextend
eg:
vgextend vg02 /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 /dev/dsk/c4t0d0
vgextend vg02 /dev/dsk/c4t1d0 /dev/dsk/c2t1d0
vgextend vg02 /dev/dsk/c2t2d0 /dev/dsk/c4t2d0
If you have an existing vg, you can use vgexport and vgimport to achieve the same result.
say...
vgexport -m /tmp/mapfile vg02
mkdir vg02
mknod /dev/vg02/group c 64 0x020000
vgimport -m /tmp/mapfile vg02 c2t0d0 c4t0d0 c4t1d0 c2t1d0 c2t2d0 c4t2d0......
OR
say the disks under c4t?d? are the new paths
use vgextend to add all the c4t?d?'s
use vgreduce every second c2t?d? to make the c4 a primary
then vgextend the c2t?d?'s to add them back, now as the secondary path.
vgdisplay -v will show you which path is being used as the primary. (Always the first entry)
Hope this helps.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-31-2001 07:02 AM
05-31-2001 07:02 AM
Re: Redundant FCA's using bandwidth of both FCA's simultanously?
The OS will not do it automatically.
There is no load balancing as such in HPUX.
You must configure it with LVM volume group create command.
The device file is HW path specific. It doesn't stray.
Later,
Bill
There is no load balancing as such in HPUX.
You must configure it with LVM volume group create command.
The device file is HW path specific. It doesn't stray.
Later,
Bill
It works for me (tm)
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP