HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- >
- VG Size Allocation Suggestion
HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
1836416
Members
2394
Online
110100
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-21-2002 09:49 AM
06-21-2002 09:49 AM
VG Size Allocation Suggestion
Hello,
We have a VA7100 with 4x36G drive space (comes up with 45G available, anyway).
I would like to have comments from guru about what size to allocate VG. Someone suggest that one vg is better to consist of multiple drives that are not bigger than 10G. In VA technology, you can create lun as a drive, so you can create more drives as wish. My question is would there be any difference if we make one vg consisting of one 20G drive or two 10G drives? With VA, would disk size be a matter?
Any help is very appreciated, as always.
Steven
We have a VA7100 with 4x36G drive space (comes up with 45G available, anyway).
I would like to have comments from guru about what size to allocate VG. Someone suggest that one vg is better to consist of multiple drives that are not bigger than 10G. In VA technology, you can create lun as a drive, so you can create more drives as wish. My question is would there be any difference if we make one vg consisting of one 20G drive or two 10G drives? With VA, would disk size be a matter?
Any help is very appreciated, as always.
Steven
Steve
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-23-2002 03:19 AM
06-23-2002 03:19 AM
Re: VG Size Allocation Suggestion
Hi
I am not quite sure I understand your question correct.
As I understand the VA7100 array works somewhat different from ordinary "RAID boxes" as it always stripes the data across evry physical disk. In this case it should make no difference (performance or security) how you create your lun's. With "ordinary" raid technology, the more drives you use in a RAID-set the better performance you get.
I am not quite sure I understand your question correct.
As I understand the VA7100 array works somewhat different from ordinary "RAID boxes" as it always stripes the data across evry physical disk. In this case it should make no difference (performance or security) how you create your lun's. With "ordinary" raid technology, the more drives you use in a RAID-set the better performance you get.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-23-2002 07:50 AM
06-23-2002 07:50 AM
Re: VG Size Allocation Suggestion
Hi,
Both are equal from the LVM point of view.
According to performance it is better 2*10GB.
Regards,
AR
Both are equal from the LVM point of view.
According to performance it is better 2*10GB.
Regards,
AR
If i am doing the same way you are doing to me then what is the difference between us.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2002 07:40 AM
06-24-2002 07:40 AM
Re: VG Size Allocation Suggestion
Steven,
It is best to create at least (2)LUNS or as you described, "disks" per Volume Group. The reason for this is performnce from the interfaces. This is of course assuming you have (2) fibre channel interfaces going to (2) controllers on the VA7100 or to a fibre channel switch. This allows you to alternate the primary controller for each LUN. This provides the ability for an alternate link as well as both Host Bus Adapters being utilized.
HTH,
Dave
It is best to create at least (2)LUNS or as you described, "disks" per Volume Group. The reason for this is performnce from the interfaces. This is of course assuming you have (2) fibre channel interfaces going to (2) controllers on the VA7100 or to a fibre channel switch. This allows you to alternate the primary controller for each LUN. This provides the ability for an alternate link as well as both Host Bus Adapters being utilized.
HTH,
Dave
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP