- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- HPE Aruba Networking & ProVision-based
- >
- 2930M Stacking Config
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2019 09:58 AM
тАО03-25-2019 09:58 AM
2930M Stacking Config
Hi Forum,
Total noob question here. If I have a stack 5 x 2930M 48G switches in a ring topopogy using the stacking modules connected in the rear slot. Then I want to introduce additional modules to increase the Uplinks to 10Gbps, do I need all the switches in the stack to have the same additional module? or can I just install one module at the top and one module at the bottom of the stack?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2019 12:41 PM
тАО03-25-2019 12:41 PM
Re: 2930M Stacking Config
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2019 02:29 PM - edited тАО03-26-2019 04:36 AM
тАО03-25-2019 02:29 PM - edited тАО03-26-2019 04:36 AM
Re: 2930M Stacking Config
@FMcK-uk wrote: I want to introduce additional modules to increase the Uplinks to 10Gbps, do I need all the switches in the stack to have the same additional module?
No, you don't need to equip the very same module on each stack's member...simmetry is not mandatory (your second question is thus automatically answered).
The basic principle should be to not create a weak link to a resilient stack by just terminating uplinks only to some (and not to all) of its members from the same peer (where a peer could be a Switch or a Server, it doesn't matter)...following this principle will require that each stack member should be involved.
Clearly there are corner cases or scenarios where a reasonable compromise, in terms of resilency versus weak link, would fit well too avoiding to use a lot of aggregated links across the whole stack (so just terminating a LACP Port Trunk to two stack members would suffice).
I'm not an HPE Employee
