HPE Aruba Networking & ProVision-based
1830310 Members
2386 Online
110000 Solutions
New Discussion

HP Mesh - Distributed Trunks

 
LyonJT
New Member

HP Mesh - Distributed Trunks

Dear all,

We currently have four core switches within our infrastructure, between these switches we have configured them in a mesh with a connection to each one.

We would like to link two the core switches (HP 5406) to a access switch to allow for redundancy. However when we currently add it using trunking the network starts to loop and become unstable.

Can anyone let me know how I would need to configure the access switches & core switches to allow for a access switch (HP 2650) to have dual cores with redundancy?

 

Normally we would only need to implement distributed trunks but as we are using a meshed design we aren't able to do this.

Thanks,

Lyon

4 REPLIES 4
paulgear
Esteemed Contributor

Re: HP Mesh - Distributed Trunks

Hi Lyon,

 

To my knowledge, if you use meshing, the only alternative to distributed trunking is to configure spanning tree and allow one of the links to remain blocked.

Regards,
Paul
Chrisd131313
Trusted Contributor

Re: HP Mesh - Distributed Trunks

To Confirm Paul's post, taken from the HP Management & Configuration Guide - K.15.07 for 5400 series switches, page 4-52...

 

Features not supported in conjunction with distributed trunking include:

• SVLANs in mixed mode on DT or ISC links.

• Meshing

• CDP

• GVRP

• UDLD

• Multicast routing

• IPv6 routing

• MLD/MLD snooping on DT VLAN

 

-----------------------------------------------------

Don't forget to mark a post resolved if your question was answered.
Richard Litchfield
Respected Contributor

Re: HP Mesh - Distributed Trunks

K15.08 removes a lot of restrictions, and is definitely worth reading the release notes. You may want to revalidate the design; maybe meshing is better replaced by distributed trunking + routing?
Chrisd131313
Trusted Contributor

Re: HP Mesh - Distributed Trunks

Looking at K.15.10 release, it still does not allow Meshing and DTs. As Richard mentions, if DTs is something that you definately need to utilise then a rethink of your design may be in order.

-----------------------------------------------------

Don't forget to mark a post resolved if your question was answered.