- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- HPE Aruba Networking & ProVision-based
- >
- LACP PDUs Tx/Rx: meaning of PDU Tx/Rx dissimilar v...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-16-2018 02:00 AM - edited 07-16-2018 05:54 AM
07-16-2018 02:00 AM - edited 07-16-2018 05:54 AM
LACP PDUs Tx/Rx: meaning of PDU Tx/Rx dissimilar values
Is anyone able to explain why LACP PDUs Tx/Rx values reported on different LACP trunks (Switch-to-Server versus Switch-to-Switch) can be so dissimilar (especially considering the received LACP PDU from remote peer...in this case a Server)?
Is below difference reasonable or not (the LACP is working normally AFAIK)?
Switch-to-Server LACP Trunk case (fast):
VSF# show lacp counters ethernet 1/B15,2/B15 LACP Port Counters. LACP LACP Marker Marker Marker Marker Port Trunk PDUs Tx PDUs Rx Req. Tx Req. Rx Resp. Tx Resp. Rx Error ----- ------ --------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- 1/B15 Trk110 3554552 118098 0 0 0 0 0 2/B15 Trk110 3554439 118099 0 0 0 0 0
Note: the LACP Trunk on remote Server is done on IBM Power8 VIOS.
Switch-to-Switch LACP Trunk case (fast):
VSF# show lacp counters ethernet 1/C1,2/C1 LACP Port Counters. LACP LACP Marker Marker Marker Marker Port Trunk PDUs Tx PDUs Rx Req. Tx Req. Rx Resp. Tx Resp. Rx Error ----- ------ --------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- 1/C1 Trk1 174902 174899 0 0 0 0 0 2/C1 Trk1 174898 174897 0 0 0 0 0
Shouldn't be that - in an ideal situation - LACP PDUs Tx and Rx counters should increment in unison (like the case of Switch-to-Switch LACP)?
I'm not an HPE Employee
