Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-01-2014 07:29 AM
07-01-2014 07:29 AM
MST
Operating rules state:
all switches in a region must be configured with the same set of VLANs
all switches in a region must have the same VID-to-MST instance assignment
I've setup a single region with 5 switches and 1 of those switches has a different set of VLAN's to the remaining 4 - how was that possible then?
In a two tier hierachy (core + access layer) surely it isn't uncommon to have the core switch(es) include a different set of VLAN's (for infrastructure devices) than the access layer with client/end user devices.
How can you make that work when a single MST region is supposed to need all switches in the region to have the same instance mapping??
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-02-2014 10:38 AM
07-02-2014 10:38 AM
Re: MST
The second rule is the important one: an MD5 digest of the mapping is taken, and they need to be the same for switches in the same region. show span mst-config should look the same on each switch. If they aren't then I'd be sceptical that they really are in the same region.
More recent/higher end firmware allows the mappings to be created, even if the VLAN isn't configured on the switch, and that is sufficient. Even without that feature, nothing says that the trunks between the core and the access layer have to carry all the VLANs.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-03-2014 05:43 AM
07-03-2014 05:43 AM
Re: MST
I see.
There is no requirement to extend some of the core VLAN's onto the access layer so you propose that I just create the same instance mapping on all access layer switches regardless?
All switches have latest firmware.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-03-2014 02:26 PM
07-03-2014 02:26 PM
Re: MST
There is no requirement to extend some of the core VLAN's onto the access layer so you propose that I just create the same instance mapping on all access layer switches regardless?
If you want them in the same region, yes.