HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Another snapshot / snapclone question
HPE EVA Storage
1838600
Members
2895
Online
110128
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2006 12:16 AM
06-10-2006 12:16 AM
Another snapshot / snapclone question
While we're asking about Snapshots on the EVA...
Is there any way of making the snapshot / snapclone the active volume in the EVA4/6/8K range?
For example if I had taken a snapshot of my Exchange Database and Log volumes, then they got corrupted would I have to mount the snapshots as new volumes and manually copy the data across?
I'm working in a purely WinTel environment.
thanks
tommy
Is there any way of making the snapshot / snapclone the active volume in the EVA4/6/8K range?
For example if I had taken a snapshot of my Exchange Database and Log volumes, then they got corrupted would I have to mount the snapshots as new volumes and manually copy the data across?
I'm working in a purely WinTel environment.
thanks
tommy
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2006 05:34 AM
06-10-2006 05:34 AM
Re: Another snapshot / snapclone question
Hi Tommy,
When a snapclone is created it automatically becomes the active member of its own disk "family", and only an active member of a disk family can be presented to a host.
A snapshot on the other hand not the active member of a disk family and therefore not availble to be rpesented to a host.
Mackem
When a snapclone is created it automatically becomes the active member of its own disk "family", and only an active member of a disk family can be presented to a host.
A snapshot on the other hand not the active member of a disk family and therefore not availble to be rpesented to a host.
Mackem
Talk about the XP and EVA @ http://blog.nigelpoulton.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2006 05:44 AM
06-10-2006 05:44 AM
Re: Another snapshot / snapclone question
A snapshot can definitely presented to a host.
There are some things to keep in mind:
- it is not always advisable to present a snapshot/snapclone to the same host, because the snap is a block-for-block copy which has the same metadata (e.g. signature)
- when you copy the data from the snapshot to the original volume you cause lots of copy-out operations which can make the snapshot very large, up to 100% of the original disk. This is because you are overwriting the old blocks, but the snapshot must keep its point-in-time view.
There are some things to keep in mind:
- it is not always advisable to present a snapshot/snapclone to the same host, because the snap is a block-for-block copy which has the same metadata (e.g. signature)
- when you copy the data from the snapshot to the original volume you cause lots of copy-out operations which can make the snapshot very large, up to 100% of the original disk. This is because you are overwriting the old blocks, but the snapshot must keep its point-in-time view.
.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-14-2006 01:48 PM
06-14-2006 01:48 PM
Re: Another snapshot / snapclone question
Hi Tommy,
Snapclone - yes. This is what they are for.
Snapshot - yes, but it really only should be considered a temporary fix. Reasons:
1. If you have a snapshot you can never delete the original.
2. You can't take a snap of a snap; if the snap becomes the production disk then you can never snap your data again.
3. Performance (cache+copy out).
If you want to have this capability I would suggest using snapclones for this purpose.
Snapclone - yes. This is what they are for.
Snapshot - yes, but it really only should be considered a temporary fix. Reasons:
1. If you have a snapshot you can never delete the original.
2. You can't take a snap of a snap; if the snap becomes the production disk then you can never snap your data again.
3. Performance (cache+copy out).
If you want to have this capability I would suggest using snapclones for this purpose.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP