HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- EVA5000 disk space
HPE EVA Storage
1833800
Members
2470
Online
110063
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-02-2003 06:13 AM
11-02-2003 06:13 AM
EVA5000 disk space
I have an EVA5000 running VCS2.006 with 84 76GB drives. If I configure all 84 drives as a single disk group, I lose over half the space. The max it wants to give me is roughly 2TB. It is configured for single failure, but I can't figure out why it is doing this. My other EVA5000 did not.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-02-2003 03:55 PM
11-02-2003 03:55 PM
Re: EVA5000 disk space
The maximum you can create in any one LUN for presentation from the EVA is 2TB. Your OS limit may actually be lower than this size for what it can deal with.
I bet that if you created this 2TB LUN, and then try to create another LUN, you will once again be able to create about a 2TB LUN.
According to what you told us, you have 84 72GB (I'm fairly sure it's not 76's) drives in your EVA. This gives a rough total of 6048GB or 6 TB of disk space.
Now lets subtract about 1TB for 10% occupancy overhead, and sparing of 2 spindles. (Sparing is done in multiples of 2. So if your sparing level is 1, you are loosing 2 spindles.)
Now lets figure our redundancy level of the remaining 5TB. Assuming 5TB of usable space here, and a raid-5 redundancy level. We loose about 1/5 of the remaing space to redundancy. This takes us down to about 4TB.
Now, if we had created these at raid-1 level (Mirroring), we would have lost 1/2 of the space. Effectively giving us about 2.5TB of space.
What are your paranoia levels???
Sparing?
Raid Level?
Occupancy level?
Etc.
Note: I have a total of 168 146GB spindles in my EVA that is also configured as one disk group. (26TB raw space, with more on order) We get about 22TB (Before redundancy) of usable space out of it so far.
I am not making larger than a 1TB LUN for presentation to any system because the VMS OS will not deal with that large of a LUN.
I bet that if you created this 2TB LUN, and then try to create another LUN, you will once again be able to create about a 2TB LUN.
According to what you told us, you have 84 72GB (I'm fairly sure it's not 76's) drives in your EVA. This gives a rough total of 6048GB or 6 TB of disk space.
Now lets subtract about 1TB for 10% occupancy overhead, and sparing of 2 spindles. (Sparing is done in multiples of 2. So if your sparing level is 1, you are loosing 2 spindles.)
Now lets figure our redundancy level of the remaining 5TB. Assuming 5TB of usable space here, and a raid-5 redundancy level. We loose about 1/5 of the remaing space to redundancy. This takes us down to about 4TB.
Now, if we had created these at raid-1 level (Mirroring), we would have lost 1/2 of the space. Effectively giving us about 2.5TB of space.
What are your paranoia levels???
Sparing?
Raid Level?
Occupancy level?
Etc.
Note: I have a total of 168 146GB spindles in my EVA that is also configured as one disk group. (26TB raw space, with more on order) We get about 22TB (Before redundancy) of usable space out of it so far.
I am not making larger than a 1TB LUN for presentation to any system because the VMS OS will not deal with that large of a LUN.
VMS SAN mechanic
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP