HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- IBM ESS F20 on SAN causes extremely long boot time...
HPE EVA Storage
1825726
Members
2927
Online
109687
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 03:55 AM
06-06-2002 03:55 AM
IBM ESS F20 on SAN causes extremely long boot times
I've never seen this before and couldn't find it addressed in the forum archives, so here goes:
I've noticed when we have the Shark connected to the V2600s, zoned through the core and edge Brocades (FC16Bs), that the boot times go through the roof. Specifically, at the "INIT CEF2" phase, the systems spend 24 minutes before continuing. Before the Shark was connected (no other devices attached) the boot time on these servers was pretty normal.
Does anyone have any experience with this problem? I currently have only 2 LUNs definded on the Shark but will be defining 257 - I can't wait to see how that effects boot times!
I've noticed when we have the Shark connected to the V2600s, zoned through the core and edge Brocades (FC16Bs), that the boot times go through the roof. Specifically, at the "INIT CEF2" phase, the systems spend 24 minutes before continuing. Before the Shark was connected (no other devices attached) the boot time on these servers was pretty normal.
Does anyone have any experience with this problem? I currently have only 2 LUNs definded on the Shark but will be defining 257 - I can't wait to see how that effects boot times!
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 04:11 AM
06-06-2002 04:11 AM
Re: IBM ESS F20 on SAN causes extremely long boot times
Jim, this is a bit of a wild stab in the dark, but here goes...
The slow boot *may* be connected with how HP-UX scans the IO buses during startup... traditionally HP-UX would look at every target on every controller, but would not look at every LUN if LUN 0 did not exist for this controller. This causes a problem with some disk arrays where LUN assignment does not necessarily start at LUN0 for every controller. To resolve this HP produced a patch to the SCSI subsystem which causes the bus scan to look at every LUN, but can significantly slow down boot times.
This has been addressed to some extent in patch PHKL_24187 - you might want to take a look at installing this patch.
HTH
Duncan
I am an HPE Employee
The slow boot *may* be connected with how HP-UX scans the IO buses during startup... traditionally HP-UX would look at every target on every controller, but would not look at every LUN if LUN 0 did not exist for this controller. This causes a problem with some disk arrays where LUN assignment does not necessarily start at LUN0 for every controller. To resolve this HP produced a patch to the SCSI subsystem which causes the bus scan to look at every LUN, but can significantly slow down boot times.
This has been addressed to some extent in patch PHKL_24187 - you might want to take a look at installing this patch.
HTH
Duncan
I am an HPE Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2002 07:36 PM
06-10-2002 07:36 PM
Re: IBM ESS F20 on SAN causes extremely long boot times
Just in case anyone else pulls this from the archives, here is the solution:
The Brocade 3800 uses a different method to determine soft or hard zoning enforcement than the other Silkworms. The switch must be placed in soft zone mode to work successfully with the V2600s (and maybe others). To do so, you must use a combination of WWN and PORT numbers when you define zones (see the documentation CD that comes with the switches).
After I soft zoned the SAN, everything worked fine.
The Brocade 3800 uses a different method to determine soft or hard zoning enforcement than the other Silkworms. The switch must be placed in soft zone mode to work successfully with the V2600s (and maybe others). To do so, you must use a combination of WWN and PORT numbers when you define zones (see the documentation CD that comes with the switches).
After I soft zoned the SAN, everything worked fine.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP