- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Subject: Performance Issue under RedHat
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-18-2012 11:37 AM
06-18-2012 11:37 AM
Subject: Performance Issue under RedHat
Hello!
We have our storage LUN's coming from an EVA4400 and presented over fiber to DL380's running RHEL 5.6. The LUN is about 450GB of student files, and formatted to GFS. We were noticing that the HP Data Protector was taking a really long time to do the initial scan and the backup. It took about 12 hours to do the full backup, when it use to take about 4 hours under HP-UX. Therefore, we compared the difference between EXT3 and GFS on the RedHat machines, and it was significant.
Therefore, we setup a 2-node cluster running RHEL 6.2 and formatted the 2 test LUN’s to EXT4 and GFS2. We did a simple “time tar -cvf /dev/null “ of each of the filesystems.
EXT4: 28 minutes
GFS2: 305 minutes.
RedHat Support had us try a “dd of=/dev/null if=/dev/mapper/mpathc bs=4096” on both filesystems.
GFS2: 45 minutes
GFS2 with lock_nolock: 41 minutes
EXT4: 38 minutes
Therefore, I am assuming that the issue is with RedHat, and am looking for thoughts. RedHat Support has not been very good in getting this resolved.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Emil
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-18-2012 10:57 PM
06-18-2012 10:57 PM
Re: Subject: Performance Issue under RedHat
>RedHat Support had us try a “dd of=/dev/null if=/dev/mapper/mpathc bs=4096”
Are you sure it wasn't /dev/zero?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-18-2012 11:08 PM - edited 06-18-2012 11:13 PM
06-18-2012 11:08 PM - edited 06-18-2012 11:13 PM
Re: Subject: Performance Issue under RedHat
Hi Dennis!
I have used only /dev/null as the output file. Never tried /dev/zero. We were trying to read existing data from the file system and writing to a null device, instead of writing to the tape library.
Emil
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-18-2012 11:55 PM
06-18-2012 11:55 PM
Re: Subject: Performance Issue under RedHat
>I have used only /dev/null as the output file.
Oops, sorry, I assumed the input (if=) was first.