- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- VA vs EVA
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-27-2007 12:12 AM - last edited on 03-16-2014 08:09 PM by Maiko-I
02-27-2007 12:12 AM - last edited on 03-16-2014 08:09 PM by Maiko-I
VA vs EVA
Hi
Any body can provide any technical diff betwn HP VA and EVA product.
Thanks in advanced
P.S. This thread has been moevd from Disk to Storage Area Networks (SAN) (Enterprise). - Hp forum Moderator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-27-2007 04:17 AM
02-27-2007 04:17 AM
Re: VA vs EVA
VA7100 2 Ports@1Gb/s, 15 Disks max, 1 Diskgroup
VA7110 2 Ports@2Gb/s, 45 Disk max. 1 Diskgroup
VA7400 2 Ports@2Gb/s, 105 Disks max, 2 Diskgroups
VA7410 4 Ports@2Gb/s, 105 Disks max, 2 Diskgroups
VAs support Business Copy (local copy/snapshot) but no Continuous Access (Remote Copy).
No dynamic LUN growth.
The EVA was developed by Compaq and became the HP midrange Array after the merger.
EVA4000 4 Ports@4Gb/s, 56 Disks max 1 to 32 disks groups
EVA6000 4 Ports@4Gb/s, 112 Disks max 1 to 32 disks groups
EVA8000 8 Ports@4Gb/s, 240 Disks max 1 to 32 disks groups
EVAs support Business Copy (local copy/snapshot/snapclone/mirrorclone) and Continuous Access (Remote Copy sync or async).
Dynamic LUN growth and much more available!
The EVAs are the current HP midrange arrays with very high availability and performance, rich set of features and is very popular: HP recently sold the 30000th EVA!!
Cheers
Peter
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-27-2007 05:00 AM
02-27-2007 05:00 AM
Re: VA vs EVA
I wonder how you create 32 disk groups with only 56 disk drives as I thought you need at least 8 disk drives per disk group ;-)
Even if I divide 240 by 32, I get 7.5.
8 * 32 = 256
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-27-2007 06:57 AM
02-27-2007 06:57 AM
Re: VA vs EVA
First I have to admit that I made a typo and pasted it on and on!
The EVA firmware architecturally supports up to 16 (not 32) disks groups (DG)!!
16 DG, 8 disks per DG means 128 disks, which can only be reached with an EVA8000!
Anyway, we do not recommend buidling lots of DG.
Larger DG are better for performance and more space efficient.
Also see the EVA best practice whitepaper on:
http://h18006.www1.hp.com/storage/arraywhitepapers.html
So, the correct EVA tables must look like this:
EVA4000 4 Ports@4Gb/s, 56 Disks max 1 to 16 disks groups (theoretically)
EVA6000 4 Ports@4Gb/s, 112 Disks max 1 to 16 disks groups (theoretically)
EVA8000 8 Ports@4Gb/s, 240 Disks max 1 to 16 disks groups
Cheers
Peter
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-27-2007 08:07 PM
02-27-2007 08:07 PM
Re: VA vs EVA
You are correct about the max disks per system but:
EVA 3000/4000 max disk groups = 7
EVA 6000 max disk groups = 12
EVA 5000/8000 max disk groups = 16
Nither can do 16 because an EVA only supports a maximum of 120 per loop pair & the 4/6K only have one loop pair as they are the same controller really. A DG requires a minimum of 8 disks up to the maximum of the disks available or the limit on the box.
Regards,
- MARK -
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-27-2007 11:46 PM
02-27-2007 11:46 PM
Re: VA vs EVA
That is exactly what I wrote above (EVA8k eample) and therefore I stated theoretically for EVA4k and 6k.
The XCS code actually does support 16 DG, the available physical disk do not!
Cheers
Peter