- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Integrity Servers
- >
- Blade Vs Rack mounted Servers
Integrity Servers
1819717
Members
2776
Online
109606
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-20-2008 06:15 AM
тАО02-20-2008 06:15 AM
Blade Vs Rack mounted Servers
Hi,
We planned to introduce HP C-class blade servers. I would like to have few strong reasons on why to choose blade servers instead rack mounted?
What are the limitations or demerits of blades instead rack servers apart from memory expansions. (Please address the max risk if any)
What sought of resilience or backup plans needs to keep in-hand before or after blade serverтАЩs introduction.
How much power (watts) and cooling required for a full load (16 * ┬╜ blades or 8 full blades)
Any recommendations or best practices for blade servers.
Any merits or demerits using it with VMware ESX 3.5
Are there any other best blade models than the c-class blades?
Could you please provide me the success ratio of using blade servers, also provide me the blade serverтАЩs forums if any?
I have seen few presentations over youtube and came to know IBM blades are more reliable and few vulnerable incidents expected with HP. Could you please provide me some recommendations or best practices to overcome those issues.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkYGQ7KjC7Y&feature=related
We planned to introduce HP C-class blade servers. I would like to have few strong reasons on why to choose blade servers instead rack mounted?
What are the limitations or demerits of blades instead rack servers apart from memory expansions. (Please address the max risk if any)
What sought of resilience or backup plans needs to keep in-hand before or after blade serverтАЩs introduction.
How much power (watts) and cooling required for a full load (16 * ┬╜ blades or 8 full blades)
Any recommendations or best practices for blade servers.
Any merits or demerits using it with VMware ESX 3.5
Are there any other best blade models than the c-class blades?
Could you please provide me the success ratio of using blade servers, also provide me the blade serverтАЩs forums if any?
I have seen few presentations over youtube and came to know IBM blades are more reliable and few vulnerable incidents expected with HP. Could you please provide me some recommendations or best practices to overcome those issues.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkYGQ7KjC7Y&feature=related
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-20-2008 06:58 AM
тАО02-20-2008 06:58 AM
Re: Blade Vs Rack mounted Servers
Do you talk about blades in general or about Integrities in particular?
(you placed the thread in the Integrity subforum)
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
(you placed the thread in the Integrity subforum)
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-20-2008 08:10 AM
тАО02-20-2008 08:10 AM
Re: Blade Vs Rack mounted Servers
I would like to have few strong reasons on why to choose blade servers instead rack mounted?
1) Density, 16 blades, 2 CPUs each, 4 cores each CPU in 10U of space.
2) Less cabling, 6 power cable per 16 servers, 10 network cables per 16 servers, etc.
3) More durable, external high-eficient power supplies and fans. More easy to replace.
What are the limitations or demerits of blades instead rack servers apart from memory expansions
c-Class uses SAS disks like other Proliant, a half-height blade has 8 DIMM slots, so maximum 32 GB RAM. Yo can add 2 mezzanine for up to 6 extra network or fiber channel ports. I do not see any limitation here.
What sought of resilience or backup plans needs to keep in-hand before or after blade server├в s introduction.
Using RDP software, you can program automatic OS installation and software distribution, and even a "per bay" installation. Remove a blade from a bay, insert another one and it will be configured in the same manner.
How much power (watts) and cooling required for a full load (16 * ├В┬╜ blades or 8 full blades)
About 5000 W, depending on how many mezzanines, DIMMs, and switches on the back
The discusion about realibility is a thought one, everyone will have arguments, but c-Class is a good design, the cooling system is unique and the administration is dead easy.
Also, check the new Virtual Connect modules, they make the SAN and LAN administration a lot easier.
1) Density, 16 blades, 2 CPUs each, 4 cores each CPU in 10U of space.
2) Less cabling, 6 power cable per 16 servers, 10 network cables per 16 servers, etc.
3) More durable, external high-eficient power supplies and fans. More easy to replace.
What are the limitations or demerits of blades instead rack servers apart from memory expansions
c-Class uses SAS disks like other Proliant, a half-height blade has 8 DIMM slots, so maximum 32 GB RAM. Yo can add 2 mezzanine for up to 6 extra network or fiber channel ports. I do not see any limitation here.
What sought of resilience or backup plans needs to keep in-hand before or after blade server├в s introduction.
Using RDP software, you can program automatic OS installation and software distribution, and even a "per bay" installation. Remove a blade from a bay, insert another one and it will be configured in the same manner.
How much power (watts) and cooling required for a full load (16 * ├В┬╜ blades or 8 full blades)
About 5000 W, depending on how many mezzanines, DIMMs, and switches on the back
The discusion about realibility is a thought one, everyone will have arguments, but c-Class is a good design, the cooling system is unique and the administration is dead easy.
Also, check the new Virtual Connect modules, they make the SAN and LAN administration a lot easier.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-20-2008 05:50 PM
тАО02-20-2008 05:50 PM
Re: Blade Vs Rack mounted Servers
Depending on how you decide to configure the i/o modules, those 10 blade servers might not even need more than a handful of network cables coming-out the chassis.
there is no rest for the wicked yet the virtuous have no pillows
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP