GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- MSA Storage
- >
- Re: RA4100 - Removing Redundancy
MSA Storage
1847851
Members
2499
Online
104021
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-07-2004 11:43 AM
09-07-2004 11:43 AM
RA4100 - Removing Redundancy
We have an RA4100 with dual RA4000 controllers that, a long time ago, was
set up for redundancy. What I want to do is remove this redundancy, so that
the second RA4000 controller in the unit operates as a separate path to the
same logical drives.
What piece of software/hardware controls whether this second controller is
in "redundant mode" or "additional path" mode?
Thanks in advance.
set up for redundancy. What I want to do is remove this redundancy, so that
the second RA4000 controller in the unit operates as a separate path to the
same logical drives.
What piece of software/hardware controls whether this second controller is
in "redundant mode" or "additional path" mode?
Thanks in advance.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-07-2004 07:48 PM
09-07-2004 07:48 PM
Re: RA4100 - Removing Redundancy
Hi Stephen,
What is your planned configuration? Do you want 2 HBAs in the server, going to 2 seperate Hubs/switches, and each switch with 1 RA4000 controller attached? Then you would need SecurePath 3.1 for Windows for RA4100.
With dual controllers in an RA4100, they are always configured for active/standby redundancy.
Regards,
Stephen
What is your planned configuration? Do you want 2 HBAs in the server, going to 2 seperate Hubs/switches, and each switch with 1 RA4000 controller attached? Then you would need SecurePath 3.1 for Windows for RA4100.
With dual controllers in an RA4100, they are always configured for active/standby redundancy.
Regards,
Stephen
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-08-2004 12:04 PM
09-08-2004 12:04 PM
Re: RA4100 - Removing Redundancy
We previously had a redundant situation where we had two RA4000 controllers, each attached to seperate 8EL San switches. Each server in our farm had two HBA's, one of which attached to the first switch, and the other two the second.
Now, I need to have 10 servers connected to the SAN, and we no longer require the redundancy option. Can we use the second controller to attach additional servers via the san switch? Or can you only use it for redundancy?
Now, I need to have 10 servers connected to the SAN, and we no longer require the redundancy option. Can we use the second controller to attach additional servers via the san switch? Or can you only use it for redundancy?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-08-2004 06:51 PM
09-08-2004 06:51 PM
Re: RA4100 - Removing Redundancy
Hi Stephen,
unfortunately that won't work. The 2nd controller is always there for redundancy, and the RA4100 only works in active/standby redundancy. That means only one controller is ever active. You can't connect some servers to one controller, and others to the 2nd one. The same goes for the MSA1000.
Regards,
Stephen
unfortunately that won't work. The 2nd controller is always there for redundancy, and the RA4100 only works in active/standby redundancy. That means only one controller is ever active. You can't connect some servers to one controller, and others to the 2nd one. The same goes for the MSA1000.
Regards,
Stephen
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP