HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- 11.00 strange ld behaviour
Operating System - HP-UX
1833780
Members
2037
Online
110063
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-28-2002 02:18 PM
03-28-2002 02:18 PM
11.00 strange ld behaviour
I am getting ld messages such as .....
/usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied shared library symbols:
first referenced in .sl (code)
Whay are they strange? Because
1. the symbols/functions are definitely defined , and should not be "unsattisfied" - guaranteed. If for example, the link was missing the object file, I would have got 100's of errors.
2. The "first referenced in" is a complete lie anyway. The .sl has no references to my classes
3. This is a straight port of a 10.2 C++ application that always linked without error on 10.2
I am running acc 03.34
I have installed the latest Quality Pack for 11.0
Andrew
/usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied shared library symbols:
Whay are they strange? Because
1. the symbols/functions are definitely defined , and should not be "unsattisfied" - guaranteed. If for example, the link was missing the object file, I would have got 100's of errors.
2. The "first referenced in" is a complete lie anyway. The .sl has no references to my classes
3. This is a straight port of a 10.2 C++ application that always linked without error on 10.2
I am running acc 03.34
I have installed the latest Quality Pack for 11.0
Andrew
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-29-2002 08:00 AM
03-29-2002 08:00 AM
Re: 11.00 strange ld behaviour
Hi,
First of all, check if you have the latest
patch for ld installed. It is PHSS_24303
You say you run aCC 03.34. I thought the
latest version was 03.33?
Make sure that everything you link in is
compiled on hp-ux 11.00. You can not
mix objects from 10.20 and 11.00.
If your application on 10.20 was written
for the old cfront c++, check the porting
guide to aCC
Regards
Olav
First of all, check if you have the latest
patch for ld installed. It is PHSS_24303
You say you run aCC 03.34. I thought the
latest version was 03.33?
Make sure that everything you link in is
compiled on hp-ux 11.00. You can not
mix objects from 10.20 and 11.00.
If your application on 10.20 was written
for the old cfront c++, check the porting
guide to aCC
Regards
Olav
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-02-2002 06:56 AM
04-02-2002 06:56 AM
Re: 11.00 strange ld behaviour
OK, I found the problem.
- I am using linker switch +vshlibunsats
- ld was right about the unsatisfied externals. They were from a FORTRAN library that needed to be compiled +uppercase.
- ld was wrong about where the unsatisfied externals were referenced from.
There appears to a bug in the way ld reports "vshlibunsats".
- The lastest aCC compiler is 3.34
Andrew
- I am using linker switch +vshlibunsats
- ld was right about the unsatisfied externals. They were from a FORTRAN library that needed to be compiled +uppercase.
- ld was wrong about where the unsatisfied externals were referenced from.
There appears to a bug in the way ld reports "vshlibunsats".
- The lastest aCC compiler is 3.34
Andrew
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP