- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 06:05 AM
03-12-2009 06:05 AM
11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
I have a problem, with a server connected to a SAN to access some MSA disks .
I use 11.31 and persistant DSFfor the disks I include in LVM.
When I check witch scsimgr the disks, I have 2 paths for each disks, but only one is flagged to be ACTIVE, and the other one is STANDBY .
I assume (verified by sar -H and get_stat of scsimgr), that all IOs are going to only one path.
When I check attribute, with scsimgr -get_attr, leg_mpath_enable is set to true .. and load_bal_policy is set to round_robin ..
Any ideas ?
thanks in advance guys
pat
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 06:07 AM
03-12-2009 06:07 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 06:18 AM
03-12-2009 06:18 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
What do you mean by active/active ? Is it the only reason that prevent me load balancing ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 06:21 AM
03-12-2009 06:21 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
Then with a new firmware the array became active/active.
What is your version?
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 06:54 AM
03-12-2009 06:54 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
There is a setting in the firmware for the MSA-1500 that lets you decide between active/active and active/passive.
Older versions of the MSA-1500 firmware may have defaulted to active/passive.
It is always a good idea when running into performance issues to update the firmware on the MSA-1500 and the HBA if available.
The MSA-1500 is a pretty basic disk array and load balancing may not provide much of a boost. Have you checked to see if the active controller is maxed out on performance?
This could be a configuration issue. Common mistake is to put a heavy write database on raid 5. This makes writes back up in a queue. Data, index, redo(oracle terms), should be on Raid 1 storage.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 07:03 AM
03-12-2009 07:03 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
More or less. I think SEP is refering to
" PreferredPathMode
The setting that you select for this option determines how the preferred I/O path to a particular logical
drive is set for a redundant array controller that is in an active/active configuration.
Not all controllers support this feature, and controllers in an active/standby configuration disregard this
option.
â ¢ Auto is the default setting for new configurations. In this case, the storage system automatically
selects the I/O path from the redundant controller to the logical drive and dynamically load
balances all paths.
â ¢ Manual enables you to assign the logical drive to a specific redundant controller. If you select this
setting, use the PreferredPath (on page 39) command to specify the path."
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 07:34 AM
03-12-2009 07:34 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
- How to I check status of my MSA controllers. I'm quite sure it is active/active mode.
- Before I was in 11.23, and I was using a sort of "load balancing" playing with LVM PVlinks and LVM distribution ..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 07:43 AM
03-12-2009 07:43 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
Controller Status : OK
Redundancy Stae: Active
Redundancy mode: Active-Active
Preferred Path Mode: Automatic
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 07:44 AM
03-12-2009 07:44 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
> show tech_support
==>
CLI-1> t show tech_support
CLI-1> show version -all
MSA1500 Firmware Revision: 7.00b1500
,,,
This is firmware version 7
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 07:54 AM
03-12-2009 07:54 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 07:58 AM
03-12-2009 07:58 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
Example:
# scsimgr get_info -D /dev/rdisk/disk55
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2009 11:31 AM
03-12-2009 11:31 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
STATUS INFORMATION FOR LUN : /dev/rdisk/disk18
Generic Status Information
SCSI services internal state = ONLINE
Device type = Direct_Access
EVPD page 0x83 description code = 1
EVPD page 0x83 description association = 0
EVPD page 0x83 description type = 3
World Wide Identifier (WWID) = 0x600508b300936ee0a97deb0154f8002f
Serial number = "PB9840PX3TQ02U"
Vendor id = "HP "
Product id = "MSA VOLUME "
Product revision = "7.00"
Other properties = ""
SPC protocol revision = 2
Open count (includes chr/blk/pass-thru/class) = 1
Raw open count (includes class/pass-thru) = 0
Pass-thru opens = 0
LUN path count = 2
Active LUN paths = 1
Standby LUN paths = 1
Failed LUN paths = 0
Maximum I/O size allowed = 2097152
Preferred I/O size = 2097152
Outstanding I/Os = 0
I/O load balance policy = round_robin
Path fail threshold time period = 0
Transient time period = 120
Tracing buffer size = 1024
LUN Path used when policy is path_lockdown = NA
LUN access type = T10 Asymmetric Active-Active
Asymmetric logical unit access supported = Both implicit and explicit
Asymmetric states supported = ao_sup, an_sup
Preferred paths reported by device = Yes
Preferred LUN paths = 0
Driver esdisk Status Information :
Capacity in number of blocks = 2048002047
Block size in bytes = 512
Number of active IOs = 0
Special properties =
Maximum number of IO retries = 45
IO transfer timeout in secs = 30
FORMAT command timeout in secs = 86400
START UNIT command timeout in secs = 60
Timeout in secs before starting failing IO = 120
IO infinite retries = false
root@ssrv117:.../rootpr #
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-13-2009 02:45 AM
03-13-2009 02:45 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
pat
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-16-2009 02:16 AM
03-16-2009 02:16 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
I'm still trying to make both path in activation, but I still don't have the solution ..
Can it be a 11.31 problem or wrong configuration ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2009 02:09 AM
03-26-2009 02:09 AM
Re: 11.31 MSA1500 et load balancing
no solution to my problem ?
My server in these config is sending 80% lof the load activity to one HBA , and nearly nothing to the other ...
That's not well balanced and so performance are not the best I can get ..