- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- 2-node cluster with single network interface
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-22-2005 07:46 AM
12-22-2005 07:46 AM
2-node cluster with single network interface
i need to configure a 2-node SG-cluster, but unfortunately the nodes only have 1 network interface (i know that this isn't exactly HA but i do not have a choice at this moment).
When i disconnect the network-cable on the node where my SG-package is running, the cluster starts reforming (because there's no heartbeat) but it's always the node where the package was already running, that gets the lock disk. (leaving me with an package without network)
I would expect that there is only 50% chance that the same node gets the package.
Is it not possible to configure SG so that it will not try to get the lock disk in case of a network-failure, leaving the lock-disk for the other node?
Does implementing a standby heartbeat over RS232 make any difference for the above scenario?
Thanks in advance for any response,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-22-2005 07:53 AM
12-22-2005 07:53 AM
Re: 2-node cluster with single network interface
http://docs.hp.com/en/B3936-90079/ch03s07.html#d0e4914
Also read on same page "Responses to Hardware Failures " - you can decide how you want a package to behave in a network failure - IE - stay up or come down...
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-22-2005 08:11 AM
12-22-2005 08:11 AM
Re: 2-node cluster with single network interface
I do not think you can control which server gets the lock disk in the case of a tie breaker situation.
Hope this helps.
regds
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-22-2005 08:27 AM
12-22-2005 08:27 AM
Re: 2-node cluster with single network interface
Only way I can see around this would be to monitor the subnet in your package and to set NODE_FAIL_FAST_ENABLED to YES in your package conf file. That way on subnet failure the node should TOC, giving the other node a chance to grab the cluster lock...
... but of course you're running in an unsupported configuration - so really SG can choose to behave however it likes!
HTH
Duncan
I am an HPE Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-22-2005 09:16 AM
12-22-2005 09:16 AM
Re: 2-node cluster with single network interface
The serial heartbeat is NOT a full heartbeat, but it does allow communication so that the node that has LOST the network will be TOC'ed, and the node that still has a working network will remain running and take over the package if needed.