- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- A doubt reg extending LVs
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2002 03:13 AM
02-20-2002 03:13 AM
I need ur suggestion regarding extending the size of an LV.
Generally if I need to extend the size of /var mounted on /dev/vg00/lvol9, I do the following :
1. lvextend -l
2. /usr/lbin/fs/vxfs/fsadm -F vxfs -b
In this process, I need not umount /var.
But HP-UX manuals tell that to extend a LV,
1. lvextend -l size /dev/vg00/lovl9
2. umount /var
3. extendfs -F vxfs /dev/vg00/rlovl9
4. mount /var
But both the processes do the same.
No my question is which is safer?
Is there anything wrong/harmful in my approach?
What is the difference between both of them?
I'ld appreciate any help/clarifications in this regard.
TIA,
Raghu.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2002 03:18 AM
02-20-2002 03:18 AM
Solution>> YES
No my question is which is safer?
>> neither
Is there anything wrong/harmful in my approach?
>> Apart from the tipo in the second 1.
>> No.
What is the difference between both of them?
>> Online JFS is an optional
>> pay for product and not
>> available on default install
Later,
Bill
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2002 03:21 AM
02-20-2002 03:21 AM
Re: A doubt reg extending LVs
Nothing wrong... One suggest you HAVE online JFS, the other is for the poor guy who will have to go single user to be sure to unmount /var and therefore can not use SAM to accomplish the task...
All the best
Victor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2002 02:33 AM
02-23-2002 02:33 AM
Re: A doubt reg extending LVs
The only time you need to umount a filesystem is if you don't have onlinejfs, the best way to check is by:
swlist |grep -i online
If it comes back with anything then you dont need to get involved with umounting the directory otherwise as the /var directory is constantly being used you will require to bring the maching down to single user mode and then umount the filesystem.
Good luck and hope this helped.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2002 02:39 AM
02-23-2002 02:39 AM
Re: A doubt reg extending LVs
Sorry I should have been more precise. When you run the swlist |grep -i online command the returned output you should be looking for is like this:
B3929BA B.11.00 HP OnLineJFS (Advanced VxFS)
Obviously depending on your OS version the B.11.00 will change to say B.10.20, if you have the version for example.
Rgds