HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- apparent inactivity during index creation
Operating System - HP-UX
1836417
Members
2745
Online
110100
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-16-2001 04:29 AM
10-16-2001 04:29 AM
apparent inactivity during index creation
We created an index on a 1.3GB table (using parallel(degree 3) and unrecoverable), during the first 15 mins approx 400mb was used in the TEMP tablespace and the same activity rate continued for approx 1 hour, then slowed until a maximum of approx 1.3GB was used in the TEMP tablespace after 2hours. this then remained static for 3.5 hours. During this period, top showed the oracle processes as :
CPU TTY PID USERNAME PRI NI SIZE RES STATE TIME %WCPU %CPU COMMAND
1 rroot 18570 oracle 195 20 10776K 592K run 25:39 5.48 5.47 ora_p003_
4 rroot 18568 oracle 138 20 10776K 616K sleep 35:31 1.01 1.01 ora_p002_
4 rroot 8989 oracle 156 20 10116K 396K sleep 18:07 0.93 0.93 ora_dbwr
which nearly caused us to cancel the job, before oracle then started to write the index in approx 30 mins:
CPU TTY PID USERNAME PRI NI SIZE RES STATE TIME %WCPU %CPU COMMAND
2 rroot 8989 oracle 156 20 10116K 396K sleep 30:17 81.21 81.07 ora_dbwr_
1 rroot 18568 oracle 194 20 10796K 1092K run 40:30 10.44 10.43 ora_p002_
3 rroot 18570 oracle 156 20 10780K 1080K sleep 30:06 8.45 8.44 ora_p003_
Would this period of apparent inactivity seem normal? Or Can you suggest where the problem may lie - we are looking at increasing the sort_area_size parameter, how much difference would this make?
There were no entries in the v$sort_segment during this process.
Can anyone offer any advice?
Cheers
Ian
CPU TTY PID USERNAME PRI NI SIZE RES STATE TIME %WCPU %CPU COMMAND
1 rroot 18570 oracle 195 20 10776K 592K run 25:39 5.48 5.47 ora_p003_
4 rroot 18568 oracle 138 20 10776K 616K sleep 35:31 1.01 1.01 ora_p002_
4 rroot 8989 oracle 156 20 10116K 396K sleep 18:07 0.93 0.93 ora_dbwr
which nearly caused us to cancel the job, before oracle then started to write the index in approx 30 mins:
CPU TTY PID USERNAME PRI NI SIZE RES STATE TIME %WCPU %CPU COMMAND
2 rroot 8989 oracle 156 20 10116K 396K sleep 30:17 81.21 81.07 ora_dbwr_
1 rroot 18568 oracle 194 20 10796K 1092K run 40:30 10.44 10.43 ora_p002_
3 rroot 18570 oracle 156 20 10780K 1080K sleep 30:06 8.45 8.44 ora_p003_
Would this period of apparent inactivity seem normal? Or Can you suggest where the problem may lie - we are looking at increasing the sort_area_size parameter, how much difference would this make?
There were no entries in the v$sort_segment during this process.
Can anyone offer any advice?
Cheers
Ian
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP