HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Best performance (IO)
Operating System - HP-UX
1836587
Members
1811
Online
110102
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-03-2005 08:04 PM
07-03-2005 08:04 PM
Dear experts!
For my next purchase, i would like to get the system that gives me the best IO.
The primary purpose of the system will be to host an Oracle Database used by an OLTP application.
My current system is an RP5430 with a SAN which have the following performance characteristics:
Maximum sustained I/O rate from cache 11,800 I/O per sec
Maximum sustained I/O rate from media 4,600 I/O per sec
Maximum sustained transfer rate from media 170 MB/sec
and
Host/drive connections
======================
Eight 2-Gb Fibre Channel host-side connections
Four 2-Gb* Fibre Channel drive-side connections
14 x 36GB FC disks (in which the usable area which far more than i will need in 5 years!!)
I have read a bit about the VAs.
which HP products will be giving me the optimum performance at a reasonable price?
thanking you in advance for your replies.
kind regards
yogeeraj
For my next purchase, i would like to get the system that gives me the best IO.
The primary purpose of the system will be to host an Oracle Database used by an OLTP application.
My current system is an RP5430 with a SAN which have the following performance characteristics:
Maximum sustained I/O rate from cache 11,800 I/O per sec
Maximum sustained I/O rate from media 4,600 I/O per sec
Maximum sustained transfer rate from media 170 MB/sec
and
Host/drive connections
======================
Eight 2-Gb Fibre Channel host-side connections
Four 2-Gb* Fibre Channel drive-side connections
14 x 36GB FC disks (in which the usable area which far more than i will need in 5 years!!)
I have read a bit about the VAs.
which HP products will be giving me the optimum performance at a reasonable price?
thanking you in advance for your replies.
kind regards
yogeeraj
No person was ever honoured for what he received. Honour has been the reward for what he gave (clavin coolidge)
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-03-2005 08:24 PM
07-03-2005 08:24 PM
Solution
Hi yogeeraj,
I dont quite understand your request, what is your aim? changing the server or the bay (since you are talking of VA..) maybe both?
Could you explain the:
Eight 2-Gb Fibre Channel host-side connections
Four 2-Gb* Fibre Channel drive-side connections
I didnt get it should I understand 2X2connections to 4 separate switches each connected to the bay via 1 dedicated fiber?
What bay do you have?
All the best
Victor
I dont quite understand your request, what is your aim? changing the server or the bay (since you are talking of VA..) maybe both?
Could you explain the:
Eight 2-Gb Fibre Channel host-side connections
Four 2-Gb* Fibre Channel drive-side connections
I didnt get it should I understand 2X2connections to 4 separate switches each connected to the bay via 1 dedicated fiber?
What bay do you have?
All the best
Victor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-03-2005 08:52 PM
07-03-2005 08:52 PM
Re: Best performance (IO)
hi victor!
thank you for your reply.
these are details of my current system. I want to acquire new hardware so that i improve on what i have, especially performance at the storage level.
I have the alternative to purchase the same SAN as mention above for go for something better. I would like to go for HP.
I have read a bit on the following models:
HP StorageWorks Virtual Array 7110 and and 7410.
hope this clarifies my points above.
regards
yogeeraj
thank you for your reply.
these are details of my current system. I want to acquire new hardware so that i improve on what i have, especially performance at the storage level.
I have the alternative to purchase the same SAN as mention above for go for something better. I would like to go for HP.
I have read a bit on the following models:
HP StorageWorks Virtual Array 7110 and and 7410.
hope this clarifies my points above.
regards
yogeeraj
No person was ever honoured for what he received. Honour has been the reward for what he gave (clavin coolidge)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-03-2005 11:59 PM
07-03-2005 11:59 PM
Re: Best performance (IO)
Well, what about considering using an XP128 or XP48 if the other is too expensive in replacement of the actual storage?
http://www.hp.com/products1/storage/products/disk_arrays/highend/xp128/specs.html
This will garantee you I suppose one of the best I/O performance bay side in such a way if you do have some I/O issues you will have to look at switches/server side, now to get the best throughput after would be NOT aggregating luns but to add say 4 LUNS per vg (or 8) and stripe across 4 FCs if this isnt enough do it x2 (another VG with 4 more FC ).
If you want to garantee yourself a max I/O then dont share your bandwidth through switches use dedicated fibres straight to the bay, with already 4 dedicated fibers you should have quite some performance and with 8...
Dont forget to get enough cache for the bay (16GB..)
Now you should have something great...
All the best
Victor
http://www.hp.com/products1/storage/products/disk_arrays/highend/xp128/specs.html
This will garantee you I suppose one of the best I/O performance bay side in such a way if you do have some I/O issues you will have to look at switches/server side, now to get the best throughput after would be NOT aggregating luns but to add say 4 LUNS per vg (or 8) and stripe across 4 FCs if this isnt enough do it x2 (another VG with 4 more FC ).
If you want to garantee yourself a max I/O then dont share your bandwidth through switches use dedicated fibres straight to the bay, with already 4 dedicated fibers you should have quite some performance and with 8...
Dont forget to get enough cache for the bay (16GB..)
Now you should have something great...
All the best
Victor
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP