- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Best Performance using dd command
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2008 04:58 AM
тАО11-06-2008 04:58 AM
Best Performance using dd command
I want to clone few disks using dd command. Pls let me know the best options to get better performance. Also let me know if I can use multipe dd on single system with optimal performance.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Awadhesh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2008 05:06 AM
тАО11-06-2008 05:06 AM
Re: Best Performance using dd command
Use a large block size and use the raw disk devices so that the buffer cache isn't brought into play:
# dd if=/dev/rdsk/c1t2d3 of=/dev/rdsk/c4/t5/d6 bs=1024k
You can use as many 'dd' processes at once as your I/O subsystem can tolerate and your end-users aren't impacted.
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2008 05:09 AM
тАО11-06-2008 05:09 AM
Re: Best Performance using dd command
Pete
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2008 05:12 AM
тАО11-06-2008 05:12 AM
Re: Best Performance using dd command
Sure this thread will help you in your task:
http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447626+1225976906699+28353475&threadId=833830
But bottom line, dd will not get you good performance, it just wasn├В┬┤t made for that.
Regards,
Jaime.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2008 05:17 AM
тАО11-06-2008 05:17 AM
Re: Best Performance using dd command
performance. For example, a typical value to set the parameter to is 8k
Regards,
Jaime.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2008 06:28 PM
тАО11-06-2008 06:28 PM
Re: Best Performance using dd command
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2008 07:00 PM
тАО11-06-2008 07:00 PM
Re: Best Performance using dd command
I would suggest you do a test with different block sizes - starting from 1024k, 2048k, 4096k ..
I vaguely remember I had done some testing to understand exactly what you have asked and if I remember correctly I had observed that dd was faster upto a particular block size (I think it was 16k) beyond which I could not see any performance improvements.
I had thought that this could be something to do with the chunk size of the Storage array configured LUNs presented to the server - but not sure as later I understood that the storage arrays would use their cache to get the data writeen which in turn is actually written to disks.
One more important thing I would suggest to you is how you will track the log of the dd if you are running multiple dd in parallel and redirecting the o/p & error to a common file - then it would be difficult to know which dd completed successfully and which did not.
So while logging the output/errors - you may wish to use different log files for each dd that will be done.
Regards,
Ninad
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-21-2008 02:30 AM
тАО11-21-2008 02:30 AM
Re: Best Performance using dd command
thanks Gurus for your support.