- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2002 06:20 PM
03-20-2002 06:20 PM
Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
The system table report of glanceplus (gpm) shows that the buffer header(nbuf) is 100% used as follows,
System Table Avail Used Util% High%
buffer headers(nbuf) 6167 6167 100% 100%
our system is working fine, Should we turn this kernal parameter?
Thank you,
Jane
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2002 06:28 PM
03-20-2002 06:28 PM
Re: Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
The first thing I would look at is how much
buffer cache you have in the kernel. These
days having any more than 300Mb may cause
symptoms such as this. What is the current
parameter for 'nbuf', 'dbc_max_pct' and
'dbc_min_pct' ? Also how much RAM do you
have ?
-Michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2002 06:50 PM
03-20-2002 06:50 PM
Re: Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
DBC_MAX_PCT = 50% (default)
DBC_MIN_PCT = 5% (default)
My guess is you have nbuf and bufpages defined to a value (non zero) without really knowing how much is needed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2002 03:18 AM
03-21-2002 03:18 AM
Re: Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
Regards,
Steve
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2002 10:47 AM
03-21-2002 10:47 AM
Re: Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
Thanks for the response.
I used sam to check the kernal parameter, nbuf 0
bufpages 7392
dbc_min_pct 2
dbc_max_pct 2
I also use /sbin/dmesg to check the available RAM
available: 1864580 Kbytes
We have Oracle RDBMS installed on this HP-UX B.11.00 U 9000/800.
How can I know which algorithm is used in our system? or LRU is universal to all HP-UX OS?
Regards,
Jane
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2002 10:59 AM
03-21-2002 10:59 AM
Re: Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
Bufpages from 7392 to 0
dbc_max_pct from 2% to 15%
dbc_min_pct from 2% to 5%
Sandip
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2002 11:01 AM
03-21-2002 11:01 AM
Re: Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
Sandip
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2002 11:09 AM
03-21-2002 11:09 AM
Re: Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
Thanks,
# sar -b 5 10
HP-UX fcdsjus B.11.00 U 9000/800 03/21/02
11:07:00 bread/s lread/s %rcache bwrit/s lwrit/s %wcache pread/s pwrit/s
11:07:05 0 41 100 1 6 79 0 0
11:07:10 0 20 100 2 6 62 0 0
11:07:15 0 1 100 2 5 62 0 0
11:07:20 0 28 100 1 8 84 0 0
11:07:25 0 37 100 3 6 46 0 0
11:07:30 0 108 100 4 5 33 0 0
11:07:35 0 35 100 7 11 35 0 0
11:07:40 0 22 100 5 9 40 0 0
11:07:45 0 10 100 3 6 52 0 0
11:07:50 0 28 100 3 8 64 0 0
Average 0 33 100 3 7 55 0 0
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2002 11:31 AM
03-21-2002 11:31 AM
Re: Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
If it is still 100% in the busiest time you need not to change the dbc_max_pct.
Sandip
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2002 12:44 PM
03-21-2002 12:44 PM
Re: Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
Since you are using dynamic buffer cache, the nbuf row in glance should be showing utilization as N/A . Are you sure glance is ok on the box.
-raj
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-22-2002 01:51 AM
03-22-2002 01:51 AM
Re: Buffer header 100% utilization, is this normal?
> bufpages from 7392 to 0
> dbc_max_pct from 2% to 15%
> dbc_min_pct from 2% to 5%
Just to explain this:
If you want Dynamic Buffer Cache (i.e. set the dbc_*_pct parameters), then *both* nbuf *and* bufpages *must* be 0 (zero).
If nbuf or bufpages (or both) are non-zero, then you have a Fixed (size) Buffer Cache and the settings of the dbc_*_pct parameters are irrelevant.
As far as I know, the SAM Help explains this rather well.