HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Buffer hits and kernel parms
Operating System - HP-UX
1834694
Members
2117
Online
110069
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-28-2002 07:59 AM
10-28-2002 07:59 AM
Buffer hits and kernel parms
Hello,
I have a L2000 that we just increaded memory from 7GB to 16GB. Accordingly I modified the kernel parms:
dbc_min_pct=2
dbc_max_pct=8
Which should give me over 1GB of memory for buffers.
However my buffer hits have dropped from near 100% to the following:
09:56:11 bread/s lread/s %rcache bwrit/s lwrit/s %wcache pread/s pwrit/s
09:56:13 640 1921 67 11 35 69 0 0
09:56:15 708 1971 64 6 22 70 0 0
09:56:17 757 2228 66 31 32 2 0 0
09:56:19 639 1646 61 8 22 60 0 0
09:56:21 646 1427 55 9 28 68 0 0
09:56:23 602 1464 59 50 18 0 0 0
09:56:25 719 1236 42 14 55 75 0 0
09:56:27 730 1377 47 8 8 0 0 0
09:56:29 696 1582 56 9 17 46 0 0
09:56:31 693 2020 66 14 29 53 0 0
Average 683 1687 60 16 27 40 0 0
Are there any other kernel parms I should look at? Should I increase the max %? I would think 1GB would be more than adequate.
TIA,
Sean
I have a L2000 that we just increaded memory from 7GB to 16GB. Accordingly I modified the kernel parms:
dbc_min_pct=2
dbc_max_pct=8
Which should give me over 1GB of memory for buffers.
However my buffer hits have dropped from near 100% to the following:
09:56:11 bread/s lread/s %rcache bwrit/s lwrit/s %wcache pread/s pwrit/s
09:56:13 640 1921 67 11 35 69 0 0
09:56:15 708 1971 64 6 22 70 0 0
09:56:17 757 2228 66 31 32 2 0 0
09:56:19 639 1646 61 8 22 60 0 0
09:56:21 646 1427 55 9 28 68 0 0
09:56:23 602 1464 59 50 18 0 0 0
09:56:25 719 1236 42 14 55 75 0 0
09:56:27 730 1377 47 8 8 0 0 0
09:56:29 696 1582 56 9 17 46 0 0
09:56:31 693 2020 66 14 29 53 0 0
Average 683 1687 60 16 27 40 0 0
Are there any other kernel parms I should look at? Should I increase the max %? I would think 1GB would be more than adequate.
TIA,
Sean
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-28-2002 08:05 AM
10-28-2002 08:05 AM
Re: Buffer hits and kernel parms
What kind of data is being read/written? Database?
Actually 8% max of 16GB is 1.2GB is usually rather high - but it depends again on what kind of IO you are doing. I like to keep mine under 400MB.
live free or die
harry
Live Free or Die
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-28-2002 08:09 AM
10-28-2002 08:09 AM
Re: Buffer hits and kernel parms
Your dynamic buffer cache could be overriden by a non-zero bufpages setting but your main problem is that your sampling period is much too short for these measurements. You need to sample over a much longer period of time and while the box is under different loads before any kind of intelligent estimate can be made as to the 'correct' values for buffer cache.
I doubt that you are going to see any real improvement over about 800-1GB in 11.11 and at most about 400-500 MB in 11.0.
I doubt that you are going to see any real improvement over about 800-1GB in 11.11 and at most about 400-500 MB in 11.0.
If it ain't broke, I can fix that.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-28-2002 08:26 AM
10-28-2002 08:26 AM
Re: Buffer hits and kernel parms
I've actually been sampling for quite a while at various times during the day and this is about the average that I've seen.
The I/O is for a non relational database (Unidata) going to an FC60 array.
bufpages is set to zero.
I'll sample for the entire day today and see if the results are any different.
The I/O is for a non relational database (Unidata) going to an FC60 array.
bufpages is set to zero.
I'll sample for the entire day today and see if the results are any different.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP