HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- CacheFs useful?
Operating System - HP-UX
1826290
Members
4429
Online
109692
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-03-2002 01:23 AM
04-03-2002 01:23 AM
CacheFs useful?
Is there anybody with experience in using CacheFs?
Is it worthwhile to look into it?
I'm wondering if it might be useful for mounting our tools-directory (mainly executables and read-only) instead of an direct NFS mount.
We are running HPUX 11.11.
Hardy
Is it worthwhile to look into it?
I'm wondering if it might be useful for mounting our tools-directory (mainly executables and read-only) instead of an direct NFS mount.
We are running HPUX 11.11.
Hardy
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-03-2002 03:56 AM
04-03-2002 03:56 AM
Re: CacheFs useful?
hi,
cacheFS will improve the performance for readonly files like binaries files.
The HP-UX 10.20 ONC+ Networking Enhancements (NFS PV3, AutoFS, CacheFS) patch bundle contains patches to provide certain ONC+ be capabilities (NFS Version 3.0, AutoFS and CacheFS) to the 10.20 HP-UX software base. NFS Version 3.0 capability is already present in HP-UXt 10.30 and later, as is NIS+.
The following patches are prerequisite patches for the ONC+ functionality on HP-UX 10.20 servers:
NFS Kernel General Release & Performance Patch, PHNE_13834
NFS/NIS cumulative patch, PHNE_13835
regards,
U.SivaKumar
cacheFS will improve the performance for readonly files like binaries files.
The HP-UX 10.20 ONC+ Networking Enhancements (NFS PV3, AutoFS, CacheFS) patch bundle contains patches to provide certain ONC+ be capabilities (NFS Version 3.0, AutoFS and CacheFS) to the 10.20 HP-UX software base. NFS Version 3.0 capability is already present in HP-UXt 10.30 and later, as is NIS+.
The following patches are prerequisite patches for the ONC+ functionality on HP-UX 10.20 servers:
NFS Kernel General Release & Performance Patch, PHNE_13834
NFS/NIS cumulative patch, PHNE_13835
regards,
U.SivaKumar
Innovations are made when conventions are broken
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP