- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- CIFS/Samba and Windows Scheduled Tasks
Operating System - HP-UX
1819805
Members
2892
Online
109607
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 04:01 PM
09-10-2008 04:01 PM
CIFS/Samba and Windows Scheduled Tasks
Okay, weird problem has arisen in our environment. Our Samba server was connected to the domain via a particular DC (10101)that was running Windows 2003 SP1. The Windows dudes installed another DC that is running Windows 2003 R2 SP2 (30108) and removed the RID Master, PDC emulator and any other NTDS roles from the original DC (10101). The server is still on line but is set it to be decomissioned.
Issue # 1 User Authentication
Interestingly enough, we began experiencing problems with SAMBA at that time. We use smbuser.map file to map Windows users to generic accounts on our HP-UX 11.11 Samba server. Users configured in this file are now being prompted for a password and the log. was being populated with NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER authentication errors when attempting to access their shares.*SIGH*
We were running at Samba 3.0.7. Thinking this could be a compatibility issue, I upgraded our Samba server from 3.0.7 to the latest Samba version packaged by HP...
root % swlist | grep CIFS
B8725AA A.02.03.04 HP CIFS Server
...which is Samba 3.0.22 with security fixes, but it didn't resolve the issue.
As a result of this unexpected DC migration, I had to remove our HP Samba server from the domain and rejoin it using the new DC.
/sbin/init.d/samba stop
net rpc join -S 30108 -U my-UID
I receive the "Joined domain 'domain'"
So it joined successfully
/sbin/init.d/samba start
I now have to add all the users that were generically mapped in the smbusers.map file onto the HP Samba server locally before they can authenticate *SIGH*. Why would the smbuser.map mappings suddenly stop working?
Issue # 2 - Scheduled Tasks
The scheduled tasks that were moved from the original location stopped working when moved to the yet another new server (Windows 2003 R2 SP2). I up'ed the debug level to 3 and another interesting fact is that I can map a drive to the share that holds the scheduled tasks on the new server (Windows 2003 R2 SP2) with my UID from **my Windows XP SP2 workstation** and run the scheduled task successfully. However when I log directly onto the **new Windows 2003 R2 SP2 server** with my same UID the job fails to access the Samba share.
I looked at the entries in the log files and when it works from my workstation the logfile has this entry
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(707)
tconX service=IPC$
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1206)
Transaction 4 of length 240
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(1005)
switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 24084) conn 0x0
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(287)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(822)
wct=12 flg2=0xc807
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(633)
Doing spnego session setup
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(663)
NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 2 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[]
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(525)
Got OID 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(528)
Got secblob of size 40
When it does not work from the Windows 2003 R2 SP2 server itself I begin receiving
[2008/09/11 09:42:53, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(707)
tconX service=IPC$
[2008/09/11 09:42:53, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1459)
timeout_processing: End of file from client (client has disconnected)
These two problems could be completely unrelated but it's weird that they started at the same time. I sure would appreciate any advice or input on how to resolve these issues. We haven't made any changes to our HP-UX env aside from the CIFS upgrade attempting to address what was thought to be a compatibility issue
With the lack of further Windows-ly directions, I logged into the new server and made this change I found on the forums, but there was no change in the behavior that I am seeing.
control panel-->administrative tools-->Local Security Policy -> Security Settings -> Security Options. There will be a policy called "Microsoft network client: Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers" which you can enable.
Since we are connected to the domain with 'security=domain' then we are authenticating via the DC and not the local HP-UX server. Which was working until the DC switch was made. Does this mean that some other authentication method has been put in place? Or mabye I don't understand how Samba is doing it's authentication.
I need to know how to determine what has changed in our environment to cause this behavior and how to resolve it.
CG
Issue # 1 User Authentication
Interestingly enough, we began experiencing problems with SAMBA at that time. We use smbuser.map file to map Windows users to generic accounts on our HP-UX 11.11 Samba server. Users configured in this file are now being prompted for a password and the log.
We were running at Samba 3.0.7. Thinking this could be a compatibility issue, I upgraded our Samba server from 3.0.7 to the latest Samba version packaged by HP...
root % swlist | grep CIFS
B8725AA A.02.03.04 HP CIFS Server
...which is Samba 3.0.22 with security fixes, but it didn't resolve the issue.
As a result of this unexpected DC migration, I had to remove our HP Samba server from the domain and rejoin it using the new DC.
/sbin/init.d/samba stop
net rpc join -S 30108 -U my-UID
I receive the "Joined domain 'domain'"
So it joined successfully
/sbin/init.d/samba start
I now have to add all the users that were generically mapped in the smbusers.map file onto the HP Samba server locally before they can authenticate *SIGH*. Why would the smbuser.map mappings suddenly stop working?
Issue # 2 - Scheduled Tasks
The scheduled tasks that were moved from the original location stopped working when moved to the yet another new server (Windows 2003 R2 SP2). I up'ed the debug level to 3 and another interesting fact is that I can map a drive to the share that holds the scheduled tasks on the new server (Windows 2003 R2 SP2) with my UID from **my Windows XP SP2 workstation** and run the scheduled task successfully. However when I log directly onto the **new Windows 2003 R2 SP2 server** with my same UID the job fails to access the Samba share.
I looked at the entries in the log files and when it works from my workstation the logfile has this entry
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(707)
tconX service=IPC$
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1206)
Transaction 4 of length 240
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(1005)
switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 24084) conn 0x0
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(287)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(822)
wct=12 flg2=0xc807
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(633)
Doing spnego session setup
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(663)
NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 2 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[]
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(525)
Got OID 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10
[2008/09/11 09:30:48, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(528)
Got secblob of size 40
When it does not work from the Windows 2003 R2 SP2 server itself I begin receiving
[2008/09/11 09:42:53, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(707)
tconX service=IPC$
[2008/09/11 09:42:53, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1459)
timeout_processing: End of file from client (client has disconnected)
These two problems could be completely unrelated but it's weird that they started at the same time. I sure would appreciate any advice or input on how to resolve these issues. We haven't made any changes to our HP-UX env aside from the CIFS upgrade attempting to address what was thought to be a compatibility issue
With the lack of further Windows-ly directions, I logged into the new server and made this change I found on the forums, but there was no change in the behavior that I am seeing.
control panel-->administrative tools-->Local Security Policy -> Security Settings -> Security Options. There will be a policy called "Microsoft network client: Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers" which you can enable.
Since we are connected to the domain with 'security=domain' then we are authenticating via the DC and not the local HP-UX server. Which was working until the DC switch was made. Does this mean that some other authentication method has been put in place? Or mabye I don't understand how Samba is doing it's authentication.
I need to know how to determine what has changed in our environment to cause this behavior and how to resolve it.
CG
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-24-2010 01:53 PM
03-24-2010 01:53 PM
Re: CIFS/Samba and Windows Scheduled Tasks
old thread
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP