GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Clusterlock and multipath
Operating System - HP-UX
1844090
Members
2607
Online
110227
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-02-2006 09:16 PM
03-02-2006 09:16 PM
Clusterlock and multipath
For the installation of a 2-machine HP-UX cluster I am going to use two SANs, located in two different rooms. Since every HP-UX machine is connected via fibrechannel to two fabrics using two HBAs I will see the disk space on every SAN twice. Putting the two disks (or actually two FC paths) in a VG gives me the multipath faulttolerance.
The idea is to have two clusterlock volumes, on each SAN one. So having the two SANs faulttolerant. How do I configure this?
All other network requirements are met (heartbeat etc).
For the two cluster lock parameters: FIRST_CLUSTER_LOCK_VG and SECOND_CLUSTER_LOCK_VG I can use the two volumegroups on both SANs.
What I am puzzled about is how to set the FIRST_CLUSTER_LOCK_PV en SECOND_CLUSTER_LOCK_PV parameters with the two paths to each SAN volume.
Thanks,
Albert
The idea is to have two clusterlock volumes, on each SAN one. So having the two SANs faulttolerant. How do I configure this?
All other network requirements are met (heartbeat etc).
For the two cluster lock parameters: FIRST_CLUSTER_LOCK_VG and SECOND_CLUSTER_LOCK_VG I can use the two volumegroups on both SANs.
What I am puzzled about is how to set the FIRST_CLUSTER_LOCK_PV en SECOND_CLUSTER_LOCK_PV parameters with the two paths to each SAN volume.
Thanks,
Albert
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2006 12:18 AM
03-03-2006 12:18 AM
Re: Clusterlock and multipath
Concepts of dual cluster locks are discussed in this document - http://docs.hp.com/en/B3936-90095/B3936-90095.pdf
--- pg 72.
It is important that you understand the principles and drawbacks of a second cluster lock volume group.
The cluster ASCII configuration file can accommodate only one path for each cluster lock device.
The parameters appear as:
FIRST_CLUSTER_LOCK_VG
SECOND_CLUSTER_LOCK_VG (add manually)
and in each nodes' descriptive section:
FIRST_CLUSTER_LOCK_PV
SECOND_CLUSTER_LOCK_PV (add manually)
Even though it is not possible to list both paths to the cluster lock device, Serviceguard will be able to start a cluster in the absence of a lock device if necessary.
The lock device is only used to arbitrate a cluster reformation that occurs when heartbeat transmission completely ceases between two equally split subclusters.
== Cluster Reformation Protocol ==
When heartbeat transmission/reception entirely ceases unexpectedly for whatever reason, each remaining node attempts to reform a cluster with any other contactable nodes. The cluster reformation process involves a voting period and assessment of remaining members.
When the number of remaining members in contact with each other is a majority of the original members (up to every original member - ie. transistory HB xmission failure), Serviceguard automatically grants a cluster reformation. After reformation, Serviceguard assesses unowned packages (see the next paragraph) and attempts to start them on active cluster members if so configured and enabled.
When the number of remaining members in contact with each other is a minority of the original members (less than half), Serviceguard automatically forces these nodes to TOC (reboot). This because a 'majority' subcluster may have reformed and taken over packages originally running on this minority subcluster of nodes.
The minority node does not have the time to halt the package when it is forced to TOC.
When the number of remaining members is equal to half of the original members, Serviceguard seeks authorization from the cluster arbitration device to form the new cluster. Losing the arbitration or failure to contact the arbitration device induces a TOC, but only when such arbitration is required to resolve a split-brain condition.
--- pg 72.
It is important that you understand the principles and drawbacks of a second cluster lock volume group.
The cluster ASCII configuration file can accommodate only one path for each cluster lock device.
The parameters appear as:
FIRST_CLUSTER_LOCK_VG
SECOND_CLUSTER_LOCK_VG (add manually)
and in each nodes' descriptive section:
FIRST_CLUSTER_LOCK_PV
SECOND_CLUSTER_LOCK_PV (add manually)
Even though it is not possible to list both paths to the cluster lock device, Serviceguard will be able to start a cluster in the absence of a lock device if necessary.
The lock device is only used to arbitrate a cluster reformation that occurs when heartbeat transmission completely ceases between two equally split subclusters.
== Cluster Reformation Protocol ==
When heartbeat transmission/reception entirely ceases unexpectedly for whatever reason, each remaining node attempts to reform a cluster with any other contactable nodes. The cluster reformation process involves a voting period and assessment of remaining members.
When the number of remaining members in contact with each other is a majority of the original members (up to every original member - ie. transistory HB xmission failure), Serviceguard automatically grants a cluster reformation. After reformation, Serviceguard assesses unowned packages (see the next paragraph) and attempts to start them on active cluster members if so configured and enabled.
When the number of remaining members in contact with each other is a minority of the original members (less than half), Serviceguard automatically forces these nodes to TOC (reboot). This because a 'majority' subcluster may have reformed and taken over packages originally running on this minority subcluster of nodes.
The minority node does not have the time to halt the package when it is forced to TOC.
When the number of remaining members is equal to half of the original members, Serviceguard seeks authorization from the cluster arbitration device to form the new cluster. Losing the arbitration or failure to contact the arbitration device induces a TOC, but only when such arbitration is required to resolve a split-brain condition.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP