HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Comments on proftp vs. wuftp
Operating System - HP-UX
1834836
Members
3253
Online
110070
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-18-2001 12:17 PM
07-18-2001 12:17 PM
Hello Everyone,
I'm considering installing proftpd on my HP-UX 11.0 system. I'm looking for a way to gain more control over who/when user are ftping to the system as well as what they can do when they get there. My impressions from reading about ftp security is that proftpd is more secure than wuftp. Am I correct in this?
Also, are there any hp-ux porting websites where I could find pre-compiled things like this. All I've been able to find on the proftp website is the source. I would prefer if I could get proftp or wuftp in a depot.
Thank you for all your help,
Jared
I'm considering installing proftpd on my HP-UX 11.0 system. I'm looking for a way to gain more control over who/when user are ftping to the system as well as what they can do when they get there. My impressions from reading about ftp security is that proftpd is more secure than wuftp. Am I correct in this?
Also, are there any hp-ux porting websites where I could find pre-compiled things like this. All I've been able to find on the proftp website is the source. I would prefer if I could get proftp or wuftp in a depot.
Thank you for all your help,
Jared
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-18-2001 12:27 PM
07-18-2001 12:27 PM
Re: Comments on proftp vs. wuftp
Hi Jared:
As for porting centers, here's one:
http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/
With regard to comparing "proftpd" to "wuftp", I have no direct experience. However, the Washington University ftp is the basis of ftp as seen in HP-UX 11.x, for whatever that's worth to you.
...JRF...
As for porting centers, here's one:
http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/
With regard to comparing "proftpd" to "wuftp", I have no direct experience. However, the Washington University ftp is the basis of ftp as seen in HP-UX 11.x, for whatever that's worth to you.
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-18-2001 01:47 PM
07-18-2001 01:47 PM
Solution
Jared,
I am running proftpd on my production servers and prefer it over the default wu-ftpd any day. As far as security is concerned, both ftp daemons have a few exploits. These have been corrected with patches, be sure to get the latest CVS updates to ensure you're up to date:
http://www.proftpd.org/cvs.html
You can download a precompiled version of proftpd here:
http://hpux.connect.org.uk/hppd/hpux/Networking/FTP/proftpd-1.2.0pre9/
I prefer to compile my own and run the latest versions, which can be found here:
ftp://ftp.proftpd.org/distrib/proftpd-1.2.1.tar.gz
The reason I swapped out wu-ftpd for proftpd is the extensive logging features that it offers as well as its ease of configuration. It does everything wu-ftpd does and adds more configurability. I also use webalizer which will take the default format from your typical xferlog and create very nice html output that managers just love. Be sure to take a look at it as well:
http://www.webalizer.com/
A precompiled version can be found here:
http://hpux.connect.org.uk/hppd/hpux/Networking/WWW/webalizer-2.01.05/
Hope that helps.
- Mike
I am running proftpd on my production servers and prefer it over the default wu-ftpd any day. As far as security is concerned, both ftp daemons have a few exploits. These have been corrected with patches, be sure to get the latest CVS updates to ensure you're up to date:
http://www.proftpd.org/cvs.html
You can download a precompiled version of proftpd here:
http://hpux.connect.org.uk/hppd/hpux/Networking/FTP/proftpd-1.2.0pre9/
I prefer to compile my own and run the latest versions, which can be found here:
ftp://ftp.proftpd.org/distrib/proftpd-1.2.1.tar.gz
The reason I swapped out wu-ftpd for proftpd is the extensive logging features that it offers as well as its ease of configuration. It does everything wu-ftpd does and adds more configurability. I also use webalizer which will take the default format from your typical xferlog and create very nice html output that managers just love. Be sure to take a look at it as well:
http://www.webalizer.com/
A precompiled version can be found here:
http://hpux.connect.org.uk/hppd/hpux/Networking/WWW/webalizer-2.01.05/
Hope that helps.
- Mike
The network is the computer, yeah I stole it from Sun, so what?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-19-2001 10:38 PM
07-19-2001 10:38 PM
Re: Comments on proftp vs. wuftp
Yep, WU_FTP is a piece of crap -- security wise. So if you decide to use it, be sure to ALWAYS run the latest version. That means, since the porting center always lags behind, that you'll have to build yourself.
Postfix/BIND/Security/IDS/Scanner, you name it...
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP