Operating System - HP-UX
1833017 Members
2059 Online
110048 Solutions
New Discussion

copy disk data CPIO: Value too large to be stored in data type

 
SOLVED
Go to solution
Michelle Daalman_1
Occasional Contributor

copy disk data CPIO: Value too large to be stored in data type

Hello all,

I am trying to copy the data which is in /dump in vg03 to a dedicated vg: vg08. As /dump has largefiles enabled, I also enabled this for the new FS on vg08.

#fsadm -F vxfs -o /dump_temp
#find . -depth -print | cpio -pd /dump_temp

It comes back with the following output:

#"xxxxx.dmp": Value too large to be stored in data type
cpio: Size of xxxxx.dmp > 2GB. Not dumped.

Now, I am lost, I don't know what's causing it.
And yes, largefiles IS set.

Anybody?


things aren't always what they apear to be...
5 REPLIES 5
T G Manikandan
Honored Contributor
Solution

Re: copy disk data CPIO: Value too large to be stored in data type

cpio and tar do not support manipulation of files > 2GB.
Get the gnu tar from
check here

https://www.beepz.com/personal/merijn/#Downloads

Thanks
T G Manikandan
Honored Contributor

Re: copy disk data CPIO: Value too large to be stored in data type

Also you can get it from the hp porting center

http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/hppd/hpux/Gnu/tar-1.13.25/


Thanks
John Poff
Honored Contributor

Re: copy disk data CPIO: Value too large to be stored in data type

Hi,

In HP-UX, the cpio and tar utilities have a 2Gb file size limit built in. You can copy files larger than 2Gb by using 'cp', or you can go grab a copy of the GNU cpio utility and use it.

JP
Paula J Frazer-Campbell
Honored Contributor

Re: copy disk data CPIO: Value too large to be stored in data type

Hi

You aare exceeding the limit in cpio and tar (2 gig), can you gzip the file and them cpio it?

Why not use cp to shift these files?

Paula
If you can spell SysAdmin then you is one - anon
Michelle Daalman_1
Occasional Contributor

Re: copy disk data CPIO: Value too large to be stored in data type

Thanks.

It's a 25 GB Filesystem. I will just make a backup instead and restore it I suppose.
things aren't always what they apear to be...