GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: cpu utilization over 100% by using top
Operating System - HP-UX
1849272
Members
6196
Online
104042
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-15-2007 09:06 PM
07-15-2007 09:06 PM
cpu utilization over 100% by using top
when I run top command, the information below.
Load averages: 1.16, 1.23, 1.24
399 processes: 319 sleeping, 79 running, 1 zombie
Cpu states:
CPU LOAD USER NICE SYS IDLE BLOCK SWAIT INTR SSYS
0 0.98 0.3% 0.0% 83.9% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1 1.36 0.0% 0.0% 83.9% 16.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 1.06 18.7% 0.0% 81.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 1.12 27.0% 0.0% 46.0% 27.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 1.16 31.1% 0.0% 68.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5 1.36 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
6 1.21 21.9% 0.0% 78.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
7 1.28 49.9% 0.0% 50.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
8 1.17 15.5% 0.0% 68.7% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
9 1.43 40.6% 0.0% 59.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10 1.21 31.1% 0.0% 37.8% 31.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
11 0.77 31.1% 0.0% 58.4% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
12 1.06 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
13 0.98 0.2% 0.0% 68.9% 30.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
14 1.09 37.5% 0.0% 62.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
15 1.25 99.3% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
--- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
avg 1.16 25.6% 0.0% 65.1% 9.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Memory: 7611912K (6611264K) real, 8268816K (7132432K) virtual, 2878952K free Page# 1/20
CPU TTY PID USERNAME PRI NI SIZE RES STATE TIME %WCPU %CPU COMMAND
9 ? 18925 mnadm 241 20 27736K 10212K run 114:09 133.31 133.08 onpload
6 ? 19022 mnadm 241 20 27736K 10188K run 113:51 118.20 118.00 onpload
13 ? 7571 mnadm 187 20 1076M 10212K run 17:47 114.18 113.98 onpload
8 ? 13605 mnadm 187 20 1076M 10164K run 127:39 109.88 109.69 onpload
15 ? 18862 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10188K run 71:29 106.94 106.76 onpload
5 ? 18710 mnadm 187 20 1076M 10164K run 106:36 106.90 106.71 onpload
7 ? 18843 mnadm 186 20 1076M 10164K run 106:48 103.52 103.34 onpload
12 ? 18708 mnadm 187 20 1076M 10164K run 109:07 102.09 101.91 onpload
0 ? 18898 mnadm 187 20 1076M 10164K run 96:34 101.45 101.28 onpload
14 ? 25692 mnadm 186 20 1076M 10216K run 207:01 97.70 97.53 onpload
2 ? 18841 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10188K run 65:17 88.40 88.24 onpload
8 ? 19083 mnadm 156 20 1076M 10192K run 58:17 79.36 79.22 onpload
3 ? 13602 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10192K run 37:09 78.44 78.30 onpload
10 ? 7469 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10240K run 8:46 76.40 76.27 onpload
10 ? 25689 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10228K run 51:42 75.90 75.77 onpload
3 ? 23727 mnadm 149 20 1080M 10248K sleep 64:19 67.75 67.63 onpload
4 ? 19029 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10184K run 41:41 67.35 67.23 onpload
1 ? 28718 mnadm 182 20 1080M 10196K run 168:47 50.88 50.79 onpload
14 ? 24713 mnadm 154 20 1080M 10272K sleep 61:34 49.04 48.96 onpload
2 ? 28750 mnadm 154 20 1080M 10216K sleep 164:26 34.01 33.95 onpload
Can cpu run over 100%?
How it get cpu resource when it run over 100%?
Load averages: 1.16, 1.23, 1.24
399 processes: 319 sleeping, 79 running, 1 zombie
Cpu states:
CPU LOAD USER NICE SYS IDLE BLOCK SWAIT INTR SSYS
0 0.98 0.3% 0.0% 83.9% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1 1.36 0.0% 0.0% 83.9% 16.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 1.06 18.7% 0.0% 81.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 1.12 27.0% 0.0% 46.0% 27.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 1.16 31.1% 0.0% 68.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5 1.36 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
6 1.21 21.9% 0.0% 78.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
7 1.28 49.9% 0.0% 50.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
8 1.17 15.5% 0.0% 68.7% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
9 1.43 40.6% 0.0% 59.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10 1.21 31.1% 0.0% 37.8% 31.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
11 0.77 31.1% 0.0% 58.4% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
12 1.06 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
13 0.98 0.2% 0.0% 68.9% 30.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
14 1.09 37.5% 0.0% 62.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
15 1.25 99.3% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
--- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
avg 1.16 25.6% 0.0% 65.1% 9.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Memory: 7611912K (6611264K) real, 8268816K (7132432K) virtual, 2878952K free Page# 1/20
CPU TTY PID USERNAME PRI NI SIZE RES STATE TIME %WCPU %CPU COMMAND
9 ? 18925 mnadm 241 20 27736K 10212K run 114:09 133.31 133.08 onpload
6 ? 19022 mnadm 241 20 27736K 10188K run 113:51 118.20 118.00 onpload
13 ? 7571 mnadm 187 20 1076M 10212K run 17:47 114.18 113.98 onpload
8 ? 13605 mnadm 187 20 1076M 10164K run 127:39 109.88 109.69 onpload
15 ? 18862 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10188K run 71:29 106.94 106.76 onpload
5 ? 18710 mnadm 187 20 1076M 10164K run 106:36 106.90 106.71 onpload
7 ? 18843 mnadm 186 20 1076M 10164K run 106:48 103.52 103.34 onpload
12 ? 18708 mnadm 187 20 1076M 10164K run 109:07 102.09 101.91 onpload
0 ? 18898 mnadm 187 20 1076M 10164K run 96:34 101.45 101.28 onpload
14 ? 25692 mnadm 186 20 1076M 10216K run 207:01 97.70 97.53 onpload
2 ? 18841 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10188K run 65:17 88.40 88.24 onpload
8 ? 19083 mnadm 156 20 1076M 10192K run 58:17 79.36 79.22 onpload
3 ? 13602 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10192K run 37:09 78.44 78.30 onpload
10 ? 7469 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10240K run 8:46 76.40 76.27 onpload
10 ? 25689 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10228K run 51:42 75.90 75.77 onpload
3 ? 23727 mnadm 149 20 1080M 10248K sleep 64:19 67.75 67.63 onpload
4 ? 19029 mnadm 241 20 1076M 10184K run 41:41 67.35 67.23 onpload
1 ? 28718 mnadm 182 20 1080M 10196K run 168:47 50.88 50.79 onpload
14 ? 24713 mnadm 154 20 1080M 10272K sleep 61:34 49.04 48.96 onpload
2 ? 28750 mnadm 154 20 1080M 10216K sleep 164:26 34.01 33.95 onpload
Can cpu run over 100%?
How it get cpu resource when it run over 100%?
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-15-2007 09:59 PM
07-15-2007 09:59 PM
Re: cpu utilization over 100% by using top
If a process has several threads (multi-threading), each thread can be running on a different CPU. If there are enough CPUs, each individual thread can get up to 100% CPU utilization. This makes the per-process CPU utilization go over 100%.
By the way, your the largest per-CPU percentages seem to be in the SYS column. By the totals, your 16-CPU machine is doing 65.1 % system-internal housekeeping and only 25.6 % "real work". This suggests you may have a performance bottleneck somewhere.
Run "vmstat" for a while and watch for the number of page-outs. If the number of page-outs is large and stays that way, your machine seems to be thrashing because you don't have enough physical memory (RAM): the CPU power is wasted in moving things in and out of swap repeatedly. This can make the system perform very badly.
If you cannot get more RAM, changing the load profile might help. If you're loading data to the system, see if you can split the load into parts you can run one at a time. If this allows you to avoid thrashing, this may actually reduce the total time required to load all the data.
MK
By the way, your the largest per-CPU percentages seem to be in the SYS column. By the totals, your 16-CPU machine is doing 65.1 % system-internal housekeeping and only 25.6 % "real work". This suggests you may have a performance bottleneck somewhere.
Run "vmstat" for a while and watch for the number of page-outs. If the number of page-outs is large and stays that way, your machine seems to be thrashing because you don't have enough physical memory (RAM): the CPU power is wasted in moving things in and out of swap repeatedly. This can make the system perform very badly.
If you cannot get more RAM, changing the load profile might help. If you're loading data to the system, see if you can split the load into parts you can run one at a time. If this allows you to avoid thrashing, this may actually reduce the total time required to load all the data.
MK
MK
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP