- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Difference between PA-RISC and Alpha Architecture
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2003 06:04 AM
04-17-2003 06:04 AM
Difference between PA-RISC and Alpha Architecture
I would like to know the difference between
PA-RISC and Alpha architectures.
Regards,
Manjunath.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2003 06:34 AM
04-17-2003 06:34 AM
Re: Difference between PA-RISC and Alpha Architecture
PA-RISC is used by HP
ALPHA is used by digital (who got bought by Compaq, who got bought by HP).
ALPHA's claim to fame was that digital marketed this platform for their OpenVMS operating system and for Windows NT. Our site purchased some Alpha workstations with Win NT. They were very fast, but we couldn't find supporting drivers for the periperals we were attaching (for CAD/CAM).
HTH
-- Rod Hills
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2003 06:35 AM
04-17-2003 06:35 AM
Re: Difference between PA-RISC and Alpha Architecture
instruction. This implies that the data path between the cache and
registers must include some level of muxes to allow an arbitrary byte within
a word to be loaded into a register. By contrast, Alpha always loads
an entire word and so has a simpler data path. Therefore, since the
PA-RISC will have more gate delays on a critical path, its CPU frequency
will tend to be somewhat slower. However, a program on an Alpha that
wants to access a single byte must execute a second instruction to extract
the relevant byte. This tradeoff is one example of the features in the
Alpha instruction set which permit a faster clock but often require more
instructions to accomplish the same work.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2003 06:40 AM
04-17-2003 06:40 AM
Re: Difference between PA-RISC and Alpha Architecture
Hope this helps
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2003 07:04 AM
04-17-2003 07:04 AM
Re: Difference between PA-RISC and Alpha Architecture
These computers are as different as night and day.
The basic similarity is that they are both now owned and produced by HP.
The Alpha and PA-RISC both have a limited lifetime to be replaced by the Itanium.
Parts of the True-64 OS will be incorporated into a version of HPUX 11 which will be released next year.
Very different instruction sets.