- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWER...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-02-2004 08:04 PM
03-02-2004 08:04 PM
Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
I have got one question for you, since I wasn't able to find relevant documentation and posting that could give me an answer.
I have the following messages in my syslog.log file.
Some of them are :
vmunix: LVM: Path (device 0x1f235600) to PV 0 in VG 16 Failed!
Others are :
vmunix: LVM: vg[2]: pvnum=0 (dev_t=0x1f1a4300) is POWERFAILED
I know how to get logical device name, physical path, etc from hex device id. My question is :
what is a difference between messagese "Path .. to PV .. in VG .. Failed!" and "... is POWERFAILED"? The disks that had problem are SAN disks (EMC Symm to be precise) and have primary and alternative PV links configured.
I guess messages "Path .. Failed" means that certain path has failed, but device is still accessible over another PV link. Message ".. is POWERFAILED" has a meaning that all PV links are failed.
Could you please confirm it or better redirect me to technotes, documentation?
Thank you so much!
cheers,
Slava R.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-02-2004 08:09 PM
03-02-2004 08:09 PM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
I am not sure but:
If you have a alternate path defined UNIX will try the alternate path before giving a powerfailed message. To get the right disk / vg you can:
About the next i am sure.
# ll -R /dev/ | grep 1f23
get the device file and strings /etc/lvmtab for vgname.
HTH,
Gideon
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-02-2004 08:24 PM
03-02-2004 08:24 PM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
PATH TO PV...FAILED means the physical connection to the disk was lost (scsi cable or fibre cable problem or SAN problem). The disk was powered up aok, but the cabling to it was disrupted.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-02-2004 09:13 PM
03-02-2004 09:13 PM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
According to your posting - there was one disk that failed (since you translate POWERFAILED as actual disk failure) in EMC.
I don't think that disk has failed, since it is an EMC Symmetrix platform configured RAID1+0.
Moreover, HPUX connected to EMC Clariion platforms could produce sometimes (we have such setup) "POWERFAILED" LVM messages into syslog.log due to trespassing mechanism. Obviuosly trespassing is more related to PV links failure but not to disk failure (located in EMC Clariion) itself.
That makes me think that LVM could make wrong assumption regarding actual disk failure or path to the device failure.
does someone have more ideas?
thank you!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-02-2004 09:47 PM
03-02-2004 09:47 PM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
Weve seen this happen on our EMC's.
Anything is possible with HP-UX and its diagnostic software mis-interpreting hardware faults, but the HP diags are pretty good nowadays and ive found them to very accurate.
You can confirm what happened by contacting EMC - it should have logged or dialed out if a disk did spin down - EMC will be able to log into your EMC frame and confirm it for you.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2004 02:50 AM
03-03-2004 02:50 AM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
You are right - I am going to contact EMC
Thanks for your help!
cheers,
Slava R
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2004 03:01 AM
03-03-2004 03:01 AM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
I do not think that is the case here.
You may have a bad fiber card or cable or a problem on the array.
Good idea to contact EMC
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2004 07:26 PM
03-03-2004 07:26 PM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
LVM doesn't see the disk system, it doesn't know about the hardware in between, it just sees losing contact to some disk device files.
Anyway, we never lost total contact to the disks, they kept being accessible via the other controller / alternate link, so POWERFAILED does not mean all pv links failed.
But in any case, it was a hardware problem so you do need to contact your EMC supplier.
I hope this helps a bit.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2004 08:19 PM
03-03-2004 08:19 PM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
On a side note. For the redundant paths to work they must be configured under lvm by defnition. This is a simple procedure of vgextending the vg with the alternate path. HPUX will then pick up that this disc is part of a "current" vg and assign it as a alternate link.
***It is very extremely important NOT to pvcreate the alternate paths.*** ( I hope i stressed it enough ;) ). Since most people use pvcreate -f for some reason.
There is also a timeout value, see man pvchange, also look at the autoswitch value also in pvchange.
Regards
Gerhard
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-04-2004 12:40 AM
03-04-2004 12:40 AM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
basically they told me the following that corresponds to entries in my syslog.log generated by LVM:
"path .. to PV .. in VG.. Failed" corresponds to first PV link failure.
I believe it is true, since hex device id in that strings correspond to PVlink going through failed SAN switch.
".. is POWERFAILED" corresponds to events when second available PVlink failed as well (i.e. no more PVlinks available).
It contained hex device ids corresponding to second PVlinks goign through independent fabric. HP says that it could faile due to high I/O, since we have default scsi timeout configured for PVs.
HP said that despite on second link failure, it looks like everything was ok, since they saw message :
"Recovered Path..." few seconds later.
I was given some technotes that describes this issues, but I could not find that on ITSR at the moment
thank you everybody,
Slava R.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2004 05:42 AM
03-21-2004 05:42 AM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-22-2004 11:48 AM
03-22-2004 11:48 AM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
It also will wait the amount of time displayed with "pvdisplay" in the IO_timeout for the disk/LUN before marking the device POWERFAILED. It will periodically repoll the disk to see if the primary path is available and will then give you a "Returned to Volume group" message.
As one of the answers sugested with EMC its sometimes recommended to use pvchange -t 180 to set the IO_Timeout higher to keep a likely good lun from being marked powerfailed. (This can happen if a BC is being performed or if the Array is defragging itself busy doing something internal).
Good Luck.
fwc
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-23-2004 03:03 AM
03-23-2004 03:03 AM
Re: Difference between "Path .. Failed" and "POWERFAILED"
Roland