- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Difference between usage info provided by bdf and ...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Knowledge Base
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2002 11:38 AM
11-12-2002 11:38 AM
I need to know the file system usage to plan for my backup requirements. However the bdf output and that of the du command are quite different. (i.e. a du of the whole system does not match the total of kbytes used or available from the bdf output).
Can anyone shine some light on this?
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
B.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2002 11:42 AM
11-12-2002 11:42 AM
Solutionhttp://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xd52b06350fe2d61190050090279cd0f9,00.html
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x8c8e402f24d5d61190050090279cd0f9,00.html
and many others.
I think you'll find your answer in one of those threads.
Pete
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2002 11:42 AM
11-12-2002 11:42 AM
Re: Difference between usage info provided by bdf and du
- bdf gives you the size of the fs in kbytes.
- du gives the disk usage in disk blocks of 512 bytes.
du with -k option will give you kbytes though. (like du -k /var )
This will still not match since a filesystem is not the same as a disk. The filesystem has some overhead.
Hope this helps,
Donald
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2002 11:57 AM
11-12-2002 11:57 AM
Re: Difference between usage info provided by bdf and du
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x308b402f24d5d61190050090279cd0f9,00.html
Pete
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2002 12:02 PM
11-12-2002 12:02 PM
Re: Difference between usage info provided by bdf and du
Also the possibilty of a file having been removed whilst a process was still writing to it will not release the space consumed by the file.
I have seen this also to have caused differences between bdf and du
Regards
Steve
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2002 12:22 PM
11-12-2002 12:22 PM
Re: Difference between usage info provided by bdf and du
However, du will give you the actual utilised space.
Here the difference is the overhead that filesystems have. The overhead is for storing information about inodes, pointers and stuff. Ideally you may consider this that for a filesystem of 100 MB provide an additional overhead of 5 Mb.
Regards,
Anil
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2002 01:26 PM
11-12-2002 01:26 PM
Re: Difference between usage info provided by bdf and du
B.