HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Distributed LV under SG
Operating System - HP-UX
1833777
Members
2430
Online
110063
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-02-2003 11:08 PM
02-02-2003 11:08 PM
Distributed LV under SG
Background -
SG(A.01.02) between two superdome.
packages-2
package1-vg01,vg02 and vg03 with 1 LV in each VG.
package 2-vg09-one LV.
(ALL coming from VA7400-raid 0+1)
Problem
high disk ios for all volume groups. Some disks in all VGS hitting high while some are not. (high read/write ios for some disks while for others it is not high)
lv's created without -D and -s g)
1 My question is -- If raid is at 0+1, what performance improvement is going to happen if I recreate lvs with -D -s g?
2 Also we keep on extedning these lvs to accomdate additional space requiremets.
3 What effect -D -s g will have when extending lvs.
(we have Online JFS-advanced)
4 Is there any connection between distributed LVs(-D -s g)and SG.
SG(A.01.02) between two superdome.
packages-2
package1-vg01,vg02 and vg03 with 1 LV in each VG.
package 2-vg09-one LV.
(ALL coming from VA7400-raid 0+1)
Problem
high disk ios for all volume groups. Some disks in all VGS hitting high while some are not. (high read/write ios for some disks while for others it is not high)
lv's created without -D and -s g)
1 My question is -- If raid is at 0+1, what performance improvement is going to happen if I recreate lvs with -D -s g?
2 Also we keep on extedning these lvs to accomdate additional space requiremets.
3 What effect -D -s g will have when extending lvs.
(we have Online JFS-advanced)
4 Is there any connection between distributed LVs(-D -s g)and SG.
There is no substitute to HARDWORK
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-03-2003 12:40 AM
02-03-2003 12:40 AM
Re: Distributed LV under SG
no replies.
pushing to the top
pushing to the top
There is no substitute to HARDWORK
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-03-2003 01:06 AM
02-03-2003 01:06 AM
Re: Distributed LV under SG
Hi,
1. You will spread I/O's more evenly across 'disks' at the LVM level but as these are mirrored and striped in the VA7400 then I don't see any benefit.
2/3. Not a problem whether you use -D + -s g or not.
4. No
Generally, you'll be better off investigating and fixing why your apps are doing so much I/O (e.g. badly written SQL etc) rather than trying to get a small increase in performance from the underlying hardware.
Regards,
John
1. You will spread I/O's more evenly across 'disks' at the LVM level but as these are mirrored and striped in the VA7400 then I don't see any benefit.
2/3. Not a problem whether you use -D + -s g or not.
4. No
Generally, you'll be better off investigating and fixing why your apps are doing so much I/O (e.g. badly written SQL etc) rather than trying to get a small increase in performance from the underlying hardware.
Regards,
John
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP