GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- DNS NT vs HP-UX
Operating System - HP-UX
1847431
Members
2329
Online
110264
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-31-2000 09:50 AM
10-31-2000 09:50 AM
DNS NT vs HP-UX
This is regarding my last question on about the delay on telnet DNS NT Server as Primary.
What could be the advantages or disadvantages to configure two DNS one for each plataform, or what is more recommended configure an additional HP-UX DNS besides the existing NT DNS?
Thanks in advance
Veronica
What could be the advantages or disadvantages to configure two DNS one for each plataform, or what is more recommended configure an additional HP-UX DNS besides the existing NT DNS?
Thanks in advance
Veronica
Always is important to know the opinion of other people with or without experience
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-31-2000 09:51 AM
10-31-2000 09:51 AM
Re: DNS NT vs HP-UX
THIS WAS MY LAST QUESTION!,,,,
////////////////////////////////
I everybody!
My company have three sites named CMX1, CMX2 and CMX3, each one has a DNS NT Server, and the UNIX Servers for each plant has that NT DNS Server defined.
Today the NT Admin turn off the DNS forwards, and in that moment if anybody could conect to any of the servers by telnet we had a delay, about 20 seconds. I configure DNS on Name Server Switch from SAM I put the first source /etc/hosts and as sencond DNS.
If I put only /etc/hosts the conection by telnet is immediately. Why is this happening?
Or if the NT Admin turn on again the forwarders, my problem is resolve, I don't have any NT experience, and I don't know what those forwards do.
Then, these are my questions?
Why happend that with the turn on, turn off of the NT forwards?
Why I resolve my problem if is only configure the /etc/hosts in the Name Service Switch?
What others alternatives are possible to avoid this big problem to me? Could I put HP-UX as a secondary DNS?
I have never done a DNS Unix, somebody could help me?
I know there are a lot of questions but I will appreciated your comments.
Best Regards,
Veronica
////////////////////////////////
I everybody!
My company have three sites named CMX1, CMX2 and CMX3, each one has a DNS NT Server, and the UNIX Servers for each plant has that NT DNS Server defined.
Today the NT Admin turn off the DNS forwards, and in that moment if anybody could conect to any of the servers by telnet we had a delay, about 20 seconds. I configure DNS on Name Server Switch from SAM I put the first source /etc/hosts and as sencond DNS.
If I put only /etc/hosts the conection by telnet is immediately. Why is this happening?
Or if the NT Admin turn on again the forwarders, my problem is resolve, I don't have any NT experience, and I don't know what those forwards do.
Then, these are my questions?
Why happend that with the turn on, turn off of the NT forwards?
Why I resolve my problem if is only configure the /etc/hosts in the Name Service Switch?
What others alternatives are possible to avoid this big problem to me? Could I put HP-UX as a secondary DNS?
I have never done a DNS Unix, somebody could help me?
I know there are a lot of questions but I will appreciated your comments.
Best Regards,
Veronica
Always is important to know the opinion of other people with or without experience
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-31-2000 09:52 AM
10-31-2000 09:52 AM
Re: DNS NT vs HP-UX
THIS WAS MY LAST QUESTION!,,,,
////////////////////////////////
I everybody!
My company have three sites named CMX1, CMX2 and CMX3, each one has a DNS NT Server, and the UNIX Servers for each plant has that NT DNS Server defined.
Today the NT Admin turn off the DNS forwards, and in that moment if anybody could conect to any of the servers by telnet we had a delay, about 20 seconds. I configure DNS on Name Server Switch from SAM I put the first source /etc/hosts and as sencond DNS.
If I put only /etc/hosts the conection by telnet is immediately. Why is this happening?
Or if the NT Admin turn on again the forwarders, my problem is resolve, I don't have any NT experience, and I don't know what those forwards do.
Then, these are my questions?
Why happend that with the turn on, turn off of the NT forwards?
Why I resolve my problem if is only configure the /etc/hosts in the Name Service Switch?
What others alternatives are possible to avoid this big problem to me? Could I put HP-UX as a secondary DNS?
I have never done a DNS Unix, somebody could help me?
I know there are a lot of questions but I will appreciated your comments.
Best Regards,
Veronica
////////////////////////////////
I everybody!
My company have three sites named CMX1, CMX2 and CMX3, each one has a DNS NT Server, and the UNIX Servers for each plant has that NT DNS Server defined.
Today the NT Admin turn off the DNS forwards, and in that moment if anybody could conect to any of the servers by telnet we had a delay, about 20 seconds. I configure DNS on Name Server Switch from SAM I put the first source /etc/hosts and as sencond DNS.
If I put only /etc/hosts the conection by telnet is immediately. Why is this happening?
Or if the NT Admin turn on again the forwarders, my problem is resolve, I don't have any NT experience, and I don't know what those forwards do.
Then, these are my questions?
Why happend that with the turn on, turn off of the NT forwards?
Why I resolve my problem if is only configure the /etc/hosts in the Name Service Switch?
What others alternatives are possible to avoid this big problem to me? Could I put HP-UX as a secondary DNS?
I have never done a DNS Unix, somebody could help me?
I know there are a lot of questions but I will appreciated your comments.
Best Regards,
Veronica
Always is important to know the opinion of other people with or without experience
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-31-2000 12:19 PM
10-31-2000 12:19 PM
Re: DNS NT vs HP-UX
Veronica,
Let me first explain that any event that happens on the network relies on some type of Name/IP Address resolution. I think that you've accurately displayed the actions of using either /etc/hosts or DNS for this resolution service.
If the DNS Forwarding capability of the NT platform is disabled, this essentially means that DNS answers must reside on the NT box, or else it will not contact any other DNS servers to get an answer. It's a useful means of test the resolution of server, but it can severely disrupt a Production environment if the NT Server does not have all of the IP Addresses to resolve the queries.
The /etc/nsswitch.conf file determines whether Name/Address resolution is maintained via the /etc/hosts file (via the keyword file), or DNS (via the keyword DNS).
In your situation, I would highly recommend installing either the Nameserver addresses which the NT Servers use for their resolution (in the /etc/resolv.conf file), or to establish a fully functional Secondary Caching server which maintains the entire Domain Structure for your company. The later will make you more reliable and immune to all of the changes which your NT Administrator deems appropriate to test upon you.
Please let me know if you need further instructions and if this information was helpful.
Happy Halloween!
Let me first explain that any event that happens on the network relies on some type of Name/IP Address resolution. I think that you've accurately displayed the actions of using either /etc/hosts or DNS for this resolution service.
If the DNS Forwarding capability of the NT platform is disabled, this essentially means that DNS answers must reside on the NT box, or else it will not contact any other DNS servers to get an answer. It's a useful means of test the resolution of server, but it can severely disrupt a Production environment if the NT Server does not have all of the IP Addresses to resolve the queries.
The /etc/nsswitch.conf file determines whether Name/Address resolution is maintained via the /etc/hosts file (via the keyword file), or DNS (via the keyword DNS).
In your situation, I would highly recommend installing either the Nameserver addresses which the NT Servers use for their resolution (in the /etc/resolv.conf file), or to establish a fully functional Secondary Caching server which maintains the entire Domain Structure for your company. The later will make you more reliable and immune to all of the changes which your NT Administrator deems appropriate to test upon you.
Please let me know if you need further instructions and if this information was helpful.
Happy Halloween!
Sr. Systems Consultant @ ABS Computer Technology, Inc. http://www.abs-comptech.com/aewhale.html & http://www.ancegroup.com
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP