HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- EMS Monitors Use of TCP Ports -- Is there a define...
Operating System - HP-UX
1833451
Members
2856
Online
110052
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-18-2009 05:19 AM
03-18-2009 05:19 AM
EMS Monitors Use of TCP Ports -- Is there a defined RANGE? Our APPS are contenting with Ports!
I've an outstanding case with HP, but I thought I'd go this route too.
We've a massive apps that require and use a number of ports. The Apps use "listner" processes that transacts with Weblogic ecosystems. The system is still growing and we're poised to add more blocks of tcp port definitions in /etc/services probably all the way up to 65000+. The ports we use start in the 50000'ish.
Lately though, we've instances when our APPS listener processes cannot start or spawn connections becuase the tcpp ports we defined is reported as in USE. And true enough -- it is and those EMS monitors do use them. What's puzzling is the ports in use are not consistent accross systems -- but they are in the 50000'ish range too.
Example from LSOF:
dm_memory 2888 root 5u inet 0x1027d4680 0t198821 TCP 127.0.0.1:50485->127.0.0.1:49980 (ESTABLISHED)
dm_memory 2888 root 7u inet 0x10736a0c0 0t0 TCP *:50110 (LISTEN)
dm_stape 3556 root 5u inet 0xb6ef17c0 0t421537 TCP 127.0.0.1:50486->127.0.0.1:49980 (ESTABLISHED)
dm_FCMS_a 25222 root 2u inet 0x9ebe4ac0 0t0 TCP *:50022 (LISTEN)
dm_FCMS_a 25222 root 7u inet 0x1070ea280 0t268749 TCP 127.0.0.1:50498->127.0.0.1:49980 (ESTABLISHED)
dm_TL_ada 26206 root 2u inet 0x10365f800 0t0 TCP *:50051 (LISTEN)
dm_TL_ada 26206 root 7u inet 0x106003540 0t3319687 TCP 127.0.0.1:50492->127.0.0.1:49980 (ESTABLISHED)
dm_core_h 29948 root 2u inet 0x1060c6700 0t0 TCP *:50090 (LISTEN)
dm_core_h 29948 root 7u inet 0x1070e33c0 0t48246 TCP 127.0.0.1:50497->127.0.0.1:49980 (ESTABLISHED)
We've a massive apps that require and use a number of ports. The Apps use "listner" processes that transacts with Weblogic ecosystems. The system is still growing and we're poised to add more blocks of tcp port definitions in /etc/services probably all the way up to 65000+. The ports we use start in the 50000'ish.
Lately though, we've instances when our APPS listener processes cannot start or spawn connections becuase the tcpp ports we defined is reported as in USE. And true enough -- it is and those EMS monitors do use them. What's puzzling is the ports in use are not consistent accross systems -- but they are in the 50000'ish range too.
Example from LSOF:
dm_memory 2888 root 5u inet 0x1027d4680 0t198821 TCP 127.0.0.1:50485->127.0.0.1:49980 (ESTABLISHED)
dm_memory 2888 root 7u inet 0x10736a0c0 0t0 TCP *:50110 (LISTEN)
dm_stape 3556 root 5u inet 0xb6ef17c0 0t421537 TCP 127.0.0.1:50486->127.0.0.1:49980 (ESTABLISHED)
dm_FCMS_a 25222 root 2u inet 0x9ebe4ac0 0t0 TCP *:50022 (LISTEN)
dm_FCMS_a 25222 root 7u inet 0x1070ea280 0t268749 TCP 127.0.0.1:50498->127.0.0.1:49980 (ESTABLISHED)
dm_TL_ada 26206 root 2u inet 0x10365f800 0t0 TCP *:50051 (LISTEN)
dm_TL_ada 26206 root 7u inet 0x106003540 0t3319687 TCP 127.0.0.1:50492->127.0.0.1:49980 (ESTABLISHED)
dm_core_h 29948 root 2u inet 0x1060c6700 0t0 TCP *:50090 (LISTEN)
dm_core_h 29948 root 7u inet 0x1070e33c0 0t48246 TCP 127.0.0.1:50497->127.0.0.1:49980 (ESTABLISHED)
Hakuna Matata.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-28-2009 06:13 PM
03-28-2009 06:13 PM
Re: EMS Monitors Use of TCP Ports -- Is there a defined RANGE? Our APPS are contenting with Ports!
I guess the following ITRC document may resolv your problem:
http://www11.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en&docId=emr_na-c00929065-3
Shinji
http://www11.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en&docId=emr_na-c00929065-3
Shinji
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP