- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: ENOBUFS
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-24-2003 10:56 PM
09-24-2003 10:56 PM
ENOBUFS
Surely a single 100Bt Eth card can't handle that much traffic?
Or are we saying that the Oracle listener is too slow? (BTW, this seemed to be purely connections, not transactions, as DB traffic was very low, supported by low figures in Glance and Precise).
This is a 24x7 99.95% type server, so if I do modify the kernel, I must be sure that I'm doing the right thing....
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-24-2003 11:47 PM
09-24-2003 11:47 PM
Re: ENOBUFS
check the amount of memory and swap usage.
check this doc
http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&docId=200000065953792
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-24-2003 11:53 PM
09-24-2003 11:53 PM
Re: ENOBUFS
Nope: we weren't out of memory or swap.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-24-2003 11:53 PM
09-24-2003 11:53 PM
Re: ENOBUFS
you should look at installting the latest patches for your 100 BT card
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-25-2003 12:03 AM
09-25-2003 12:03 AM
Re: ENOBUFS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-25-2003 12:13 AM
09-25-2003 12:13 AM
Re: ENOBUFS
This problem can be stimulated during two stages
1.When the memory and swap in running low.
2.the server is busy handling client requests.
That doc explains the first state.I did not look at your 64GB statement.That is why I had to paste that doc.
As that is huge amount of RAM,it is not the problem in your case,check the second case.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-25-2003 12:14 AM
09-25-2003 12:14 AM
Re: ENOBUFS
I'll look at the Eth card patches. Could be a firmware or driver issue.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-25-2003 12:22 AM
09-25-2003 12:22 AM
Re: ENOBUFS
What OS are you running on ?
Do you have any programs that are monitoring the DB logs ?
What is your latest patch for LAN and ARPA ?
Please post this information when you get a chance.
Best regards,
Kent M. Ostby
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-25-2003 12:31 AM
09-25-2003 12:31 AM
Re: ENOBUFS
The maximum number of connections is defined by tcp_conn_request_max
By default the tcp_conn_request_max is set to 20.
You can try increasing this parameter using ndd
Just do a
#ndd -get /dev/tcp tcp_conn_request_max
#ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_conn_request_max 100
check this one
http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&docId=200000065679258
revert on this .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-25-2003 12:40 AM
09-25-2003 12:40 AM
Re: ENOBUFS
tcp_conn_requests, however, is already set to 4096.
I assume the only way to check the utilisation of the TCP connections is via nettl?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-25-2003 12:45 AM
09-25-2003 12:45 AM
Re: ENOBUFS
HP-UX 11.11
GoldPack Dec 2001 (!!!)
We initially saw the TNS error in the sqlnet log.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-13-2004 11:27 PM
01-13-2004 11:27 PM