- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Evpd and Veritas load balancing
Operating System - HP-UX
1754973
Members
3425
Online
108828
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-24-2010 07:34 AM
тАО09-24-2010 07:34 AM
Evpd and Veritas load balancing
Hi,
I am currently investigating some performance issues when I noticed a repeated message from EVPd. My system has been up 194 days but the issue occurred over the past 3.
11.31 server is rx6600. 2 internal drives, everything else is on a Hitachi SAN.
Sep 24 10:03:42 whmh9952 vmunix: Evpd inquiry page 83h/80h failed or the current page 83h/80h data do not match the previous known page 83h/80h data on LUN id 0x0 probed beneath the target path (class = tgtpath, instance = 6) The lun path is (class = lunpath, instance 150).Run 'scsimgr replace_wwid' command to validate the change
Sep 24 10:03:42 whmh9952 vmunix: Evpd inquiry page 83h/80h failed or the current page 83h/80h data do not match the previous known page 83h/80h data on LUN id 0x0 probed beneath the target path (class = tgtpath, instance = 7) The lun path is (class = lunpath, instance 151).Run 'scsimgr replace_wwid' command to validate the change
Its always the same 2 instances (6 & 7). Since I'm using veritas to manage my disks, should I just stop and disable EVP ?
I am currently investigating some performance issues when I noticed a repeated message from EVPd. My system has been up 194 days but the issue occurred over the past 3.
11.31 server is rx6600. 2 internal drives, everything else is on a Hitachi SAN.
Sep 24 10:03:42 whmh9952 vmunix: Evpd inquiry page 83h/80h failed or the current page 83h/80h data do not match the previous known page 83h/80h data on LUN id 0x0 probed beneath the target path (class = tgtpath, instance = 6) The lun path is (class = lunpath, instance 150).Run 'scsimgr replace_wwid' command to validate the change
Sep 24 10:03:42 whmh9952 vmunix: Evpd inquiry page 83h/80h failed or the current page 83h/80h data do not match the previous known page 83h/80h data on LUN id 0x0 probed beneath the target path (class = tgtpath, instance = 7) The lun path is (class = lunpath, instance 151).Run 'scsimgr replace_wwid' command to validate the change
Its always the same 2 instances (6 & 7). Since I'm using veritas to manage my disks, should I just stop and disable EVP ?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-24-2010 09:51 AM
тАО09-24-2010 09:51 AM
Re: Evpd and Veritas load balancing
Bueller? Bueller?
Should EVP and Veritas co-exist or just I just shut off EVP since Veritas already does load balancing?
Should EVP and Veritas co-exist or just I just shut off EVP since Veritas already does load balancing?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-25-2010 04:00 AM
тАО09-25-2010 04:00 AM
Re: Evpd and Veritas load balancing
>Should EVP and Veritas co-exist or just I just shut off EVP since Veritas already does load balancing?
I don't know what EVP is, but I am pretty sure that Veritas does the loadbalancing. It calls Dynamic MultiPathing, or shortly DMP. To check it, try the (man) vxdmpadm command.
I don't know what EVP is, but I am pretty sure that Veritas does the loadbalancing. It calls Dynamic MultiPathing, or shortly DMP. To check it, try the (man) vxdmpadm command.
****
Unix operates with beer.
Unix operates with beer.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-25-2010 07:41 AM
тАО09-25-2010 07:41 AM
Re: Evpd and Veritas load balancing
Hi,
evpd is an integral part of HP-UX 11.31, so disabling is a nono. (besides the fact that also vxvm now uses default "diskxxx" device files when issuing a vxdisk -o alldgs list output, so DMP is fully aware and "using" them.. )
What you have here, is that the storage guys 3 days ago, changed something on the storage side. Something like, removing a lun at a certain lunID and then presenting a lun back at the same lunID, without checking in the meantime, if on the host side, something also should be done, between those 2 steps.
And as the wwid of the removed lun, had a different wwid, but the same lunid#, as the
wwid of the newly presented lun, the OS is asking if that new lun, can be acknowledged to get the "same" "diskxxx" device file as the original lun, through the scsimgr replace_wwid command..
Issuing ioscan -fn/ioscan -fnN/ioscan -m hwpath/ioscan -P health/ioscan -m dsf/ioscan -m lun.. should give more details.. about the luns involved.. and asking the storage guys offcourse..
Greetz,
Chris
evpd is an integral part of HP-UX 11.31, so disabling is a nono. (besides the fact that also vxvm now uses default "diskxxx" device files when issuing a vxdisk -o alldgs list output, so DMP is fully aware and "using" them.. )
What you have here, is that the storage guys 3 days ago, changed something on the storage side. Something like, removing a lun at a certain lunID and then presenting a lun back at the same lunID, without checking in the meantime, if on the host side, something also should be done, between those 2 steps.
And as the wwid of the removed lun, had a different wwid, but the same lunid#, as the
wwid of the newly presented lun, the OS is asking if that new lun, can be acknowledged to get the "same" "diskxxx" device file as the original lun, through the scsimgr replace_wwid command..
Issuing ioscan -fn/ioscan -fnN/ioscan -m hwpath/ioscan -P health/ioscan -m dsf/ioscan -m lun.. should give more details.. about the luns involved.. and asking the storage guys offcourse..
Greetz,
Chris
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP