- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- fcmsutil query
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-23-2006 02:27 AM
тАО05-23-2006 02:27 AM
This manifests itself with both ioscan (-fn) and Netbackup processes hanging (to the extent that they cannot be killed off).
Running "fcmsutil /dev/fcd1 nsstat", where fcd1 is the fibre port which is zoned to see the tape devices, there seems to be a high number of "Rejected rff_id", (in the order of 179000 and this is in the same order of magnitude as the login/logout/request stats).
I have no idea what this rff_id is and even whether it could be contributing to the problem we are seeing but I would like to know if anyone on the forum does know what this is, (and know if its a problem which we should be investigating).
Thanks
Tim
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-23-2006 03:33 AM
тАО05-23-2006 03:33 AM
Re: fcmsutil query
Florian
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-23-2006 03:36 AM
тАО05-23-2006 03:36 AM
Solution"The RFF_ID Name Server request shall be used to record the FC├в 4 Features for a specified TYPE that
are supported by a given Port Identifier.
If the FC-4 TYPE corresponding to the TYPE code specified in the RFF_ID Request CT_IU is not registered,
the Name Server shall reject the registration request and shall set the reason code to ├в Unable to perform
command request├в and the reason code explanation to ├в FC-4 TYPEs not registered├в ."
Does that help You in any way?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-23-2006 06:37 PM
тАО05-23-2006 06:37 PM
Re: fcmsutil query
To be honest it doesn't really help that much as I do not understand the things it is talking about. I am not sure whether this indicates a problem with the server configuration or hardware or a configuration/hardware issue elsewhere on the SAN.
Thanks
Tim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-23-2006 08:59 PM
тАО05-23-2006 08:59 PM
Re: fcmsutil query
You should inquire with (first) HP and the SAN Vendor. Get a specific explanation about the counters meaning, and then ask the SAN Vendor about known issues concerning FC (Port) Nameserver and HP-UX hosts.
Have output of /usr/contrib/bin/show_patches and swlist ready for them, and be prepared for some debugging and fingerpointing time at probably both ends. Always forward both information to both sides, then the root issue should be found, it might well be a typo in a host portname assignment :)