HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- fs_async & create_fastlinks???
Operating System - HP-UX
1827237
Members
2348
Online
109716
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-29-2001 01:30 AM
03-29-2001 01:30 AM
I'm running very slow and looking on kernel parameters. Can you give me more info when to change this parameters? My current setup is fs_async=0 & create_fastlinks=0. My data disk is using EMC and all datafiles for Oracle database are using raw devices. I'm sitting on N-class 8-way proc with 6 GB of memory. Thanks.
There's always a solution for everything
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-29-2001 01:55 AM
03-29-2001 01:55 AM
Re: fs_async & create_fastlinks???
Hi,
First, you need to identify where the performance bottleneck is, before you should decide on which kernel parameters to change.
To identify the bottleneck, make use of Glance, top, sar or any other performance statistical tools.
Hope this helps. Regards.
Steven Sim Kok Leong
Brainbench MVP for Unix Admin
http://www.brainbench.com
First, you need to identify where the performance bottleneck is, before you should decide on which kernel parameters to change.
To identify the bottleneck, make use of Glance, top, sar or any other performance statistical tools.
Hope this helps. Regards.
Steven Sim Kok Leong
Brainbench MVP for Unix Admin
http://www.brainbench.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-29-2001 02:05 AM
03-29-2001 02:05 AM
Re: fs_async & create_fastlinks???
Hi,
If you are facing an I/O bottleneck, in additional to sar and glance, you can make use of iostat to monitor your I/O performance.
From glance, you can check the real-time I/O statistics for each disk device, identify which LVs are having the most I/Os on this disk device. Subsequently, load distribute the more I/O-intensive LVs from this disk device to less I/O-intensive other disk devices via pvmove if it is in the same VG.
In my environment, for database files which are randomly accessed, you should configure LV striping for maximal I/O performance except for the LVs housing redo logs and archive logs. We are using hardware-based RAID 1 in our XP256 for our databases. We make an effort to split the I/O across as many ACP and as many disk spindles were possible.
Hope this helps. Regards.
Steven Sim Kok Leong
Brainbench MVP for Unix Admin
http://www.brainbench.com
If you are facing an I/O bottleneck, in additional to sar and glance, you can make use of iostat to monitor your I/O performance.
From glance, you can check the real-time I/O statistics for each disk device, identify which LVs are having the most I/Os on this disk device. Subsequently, load distribute the more I/O-intensive LVs from this disk device to less I/O-intensive other disk devices via pvmove if it is in the same VG.
In my environment, for database files which are randomly accessed, you should configure LV striping for maximal I/O performance except for the LVs housing redo logs and archive logs. We are using hardware-based RAID 1 in our XP256 for our databases. We make an effort to split the I/O across as many ACP and as many disk spindles were possible.
Hope this helps. Regards.
Steven Sim Kok Leong
Brainbench MVP for Unix Admin
http://www.brainbench.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-29-2001 02:10 AM
03-29-2001 02:10 AM
Solution
Hi,
I forgot to talk about the kernel parameters fs_async and create_fastlinks that you highlighted.
create_fastlinks is used to create HFS symbolic links in a manner that reduces the number of disk-block accesses by one for each symbolic link in a pathname lookup. Since you are using raw devices, you do not need to activate this parameter thus it should remain as 0.
fs_async is used for selecting whether you want synchronous or asynchronous writes of filesystem data structures to disk. Again, you are using raw devices not filesystems, thus this parameter does not apply. It can be either 0 or 1.
Hope this helps. Regards.
Steven Sim Kok Leong
Brainbench MVP for Unix Admin
http://www.brainbench.com
I forgot to talk about the kernel parameters fs_async and create_fastlinks that you highlighted.
create_fastlinks is used to create HFS symbolic links in a manner that reduces the number of disk-block accesses by one for each symbolic link in a pathname lookup. Since you are using raw devices, you do not need to activate this parameter thus it should remain as 0.
fs_async is used for selecting whether you want synchronous or asynchronous writes of filesystem data structures to disk. Again, you are using raw devices not filesystems, thus this parameter does not apply. It can be either 0 or 1.
Hope this helps. Regards.
Steven Sim Kok Leong
Brainbench MVP for Unix Admin
http://www.brainbench.com
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP