- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2003 02:08 PM
03-03-2003 02:08 PM
fsck read failure bno = 1552 off = 0 len = 8192.
Would a simple restore from tape cure this problem?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2003 02:10 PM
03-03-2003 02:10 PM
Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
Have you tried doing a 'fsck -o full /dev/vg??/lvol??'?
I suspect that you may have a bad spot on the disk.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2003 02:11 PM
03-03-2003 02:11 PM
Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
Probably not as it appears that that block (1552) has gone or is going bad.
You need to run fsck -o full to clean up the FS.
Assuming this is a vxfs FS, unmount it & run
fsck -F vxfs -o full /dev/vg_name/rlv_name
Note the need fot the raw LV in the command.
HTH,
Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2003 05:23 PM
03-03-2003 05:23 PM
Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
Take note of errors for support in case they are serious.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2003 07:14 PM
03-03-2003 07:14 PM
Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-04-2003 05:29 AM
03-04-2003 05:29 AM
Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-04-2003 10:46 AM
03-04-2003 10:46 AM
Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
I was able to determine which physical disk contained the bad blocks. vg00 contains 12 logical volumes and spans three physical disks. lvol11 and lvol12 are both on the bad disk. lvol12 is the logical volume that I cannot mount because of the bad blocks on the disk. I was able to move the data (pvmove) in lvol11 from the bad disk to an identical, unused disk in the system (lucky for me I had one).
Next, I removed lvol12 from vg00 (used SAM) and built that logical volume on the new disk (again, using SAM). I then attempted to restore from tape, the fs that was mounted on lvol12 to the new disk where lvol12 now exists. But, the files appear to be restoring to the bad disk and not the good disk. I thought I had successfully removed the logical volume from that disk and built it on the new disk, but I must be missing something. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.
Once I get the data restored properly, I would like to initialize the bad disk (pvcreate or mediainit) so I can have it as a spare.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-04-2003 10:54 AM
03-04-2003 10:54 AM
Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
Eugeny
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-07-2003 03:34 AM
03-07-2003 03:34 AM
Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
I do not know if SAM can do this (check SAM's options, etc.), but with LVM commands you can prevent this:
First use lvcreate to create the LV with a *zero* size.
Then use lvextend to give it the right size *and* to put it on the desired disk (see "pv_path ..." parameter of lvextend.
*Check* your results with "lvdisplay -v ...". lvdisplay should only mention the desired (/dev/dsk/...) disk(s).
> Once I get the data restored properly, I would
> like to initialize the bad disk (pvcreate or mediainit) > so I can have it as a spare.
Don't do that, just get rid of it, or get it *fixed* (if possible).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-07-2003 08:08 AM
03-07-2003 08:08 AM
Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-07-2003 08:10 AM
03-07-2003 08:10 AM
Solutionhttp://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x410d57bd90a9d611abdb0090277a778c,00.html
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-07-2003 08:21 AM
03-07-2003 08:21 AM
Re: fsck read failure on 10.20
If you have a support contract, it would be simpler to just replace the disk.
Pete
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-07-2003 08:59 AM
03-07-2003 08:59 AM